Politics - 10 August 2006

A) Blowhards

B) jihadists

C) poor little urchins who needs love

D) Retards

E) A little of all the above

2006-08-10 03:20:30 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-08-10 03:17:03 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-08-10 03:13:50 · 8 answers · asked by david c 4

2006-08-10 03:10:53 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-08-10 03:08:44 · 5 answers · asked by spud 2

2006-08-10 03:07:50 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

wow, did I guess it or what ?

i wake up this morning and Bush is playing the fake fear color card game again

2006-08-10 03:06:38 · 16 answers · asked by Pres. Chimp 1

Do you think Americans should get the option to take a half day off on designated voting days?

If not, if you dont mind answering, what do you think would increase numbers at the polls?

2006-08-10 03:06:17 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

they keep profiting and over pricing energy costs while american consumers pay higher bills across the board. shameful.

2006-08-10 03:04:28 · 11 answers · asked by david c 4

because his handpuppet Lieberman lost, is that why BUSH is cooking up fake fear this morning about airplanes ?

2006-08-10 03:02:30 · 10 answers · asked by Pres. Chimp 1

is NEOKON FASCIST BUSH cooking up more fake fear with the fake story this morning about airplanes ?

just 1 day after his handpuppet Lieberman loses, give me a break Bush, nobody is buying your fear tactics

2006-08-10 03:01:48 · 24 answers · asked by Pres. Chimp 1

2006-08-10 02:58:45 · 13 answers · asked by david c 4

2006-08-10 02:51:48 · 20 answers · asked by May 2

I'm not talking here concerning today's breaking news but rather the disproportionate number of Scottish socialists in Westminster. I've just been listening to two Labour spokesmen spouting about today's events and, of course, both were Scots, namely Reid and Alexander. No doubt Blair, Brown etc will be getting their oars in later. Even as a wholly patriotic Scot I'm beginning to think too much is too much.

heavenlyhaggis

2006-08-10 02:48:42 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

reagan with the cold war, bush with terrorism. bush sr. and bob dole didnt resort to scaring people and lost to bill clinton.

2006-08-10 02:48:23 · 13 answers · asked by david c 4

Most of the questions can be answered on Wikipedia, the answers are mostly mis spelled and ill informed. Sometimes I despair...

2006-08-10 02:46:31 · 24 answers · asked by keirboy 2

funny how we went without orange, yellow, purple, red, or any color alerts sonce the 2004 election, now they suddenly appear before the mid-term elections. shameful.

2006-08-10 02:45:43 · 12 answers · asked by david c 4

2006-08-10 02:43:45 · 2 answers · asked by nailla 1

Many liberals appear not to take the wider, global battle against Islamic fanaticism seriously. They see Iraq purely as a symptom of a cynical and politicized right-wing response to Sept. 11, as opposed to a tragic misstep in a bigger conflict.

In fact, JIHAD has been waged against the West since Muhammad died only 1,400 years ago.

Saudi Arabia and Pakistan don't like the methods of Al Qaeda because they prefer the strategic long-term tactic of INVASION BY IMMIGRATION.

In 1968, liberals refused to acknowledge the Communist threat. Today, recent events point to the growing influence within the Left that is unmoved by the fight against global jihad.

ONLY WHEN THE LEFT AND THE LIBERAL MEDIA REALIZE THAT WESTERN COUNTRIES ARE AT RISK OF JIHAD WILL THE FIGHT FINALLY BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY.

2006-08-10 02:43:04 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-08-10 02:41:20 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

"The Looming Tower: Al-Qaeda and the Road to 9/11" by Lawrence Wright (Aug 8, 2006).

2006-08-10 02:41:16 · 1 answers · asked by anonymousrandomsample 1

2006-08-10 02:36:04 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

This guy is so funny and stupid it is unbelievable!!! Hey Charles. Do us a favor and just stick your head in another forum.

2006-08-10 02:33:44 · 5 answers · asked by TJ 4

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/opinion/editorials/stories/DN-shia_10edi.ART.State.Edition1.2c57c04.html


The Shia moment on the world stage is being born in fire, fanaticism and apocalyptic terror. Because the rise of the Shia cannot at this point be suppressed, the United States had better figure out how to manage it.

The Shia have been a despised and persecuted minority within Islam since virtually the beginning (the separation between Shia and Sunni originated in a dispute over the rightful successor of the Prophet). Ethnically Persian Iran has always been Shia, but in the neighboring Arab world, the Sunnis have always run the show.

Now, for the first time, a Shia-run Arab state exists, thanks to the U.S. military. Confounding Washington's expectations, Iraq's Shia majority has put its religious identity ahead of its national and ethnic identification and embraced Iran.

2006-08-10 02:32:28 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

Many liberals appear not to take the wider, global battle against Islamic fanaticism seriously. They see Iraq purely as a symptom of a cynical and politicized right-wing response to Sept. 11, as opposed to a tragic misstep in a bigger conflict.

In fact, JIHAD has been waged against the West since Muhammad died only 1,400 years ago.

Saudi Arabia and Pakistan don't like the methods of Al Qaeda because they prefer the strategic long-term tactic of INVASION BY IMMIGRATION.

In 1968, liberals refused to acknowledge the Communist threat. Today, recent events point to the growing influence within the Left that is unmoved by the fight against global jihad.

ONLY WHEN THE LEFT AND THE LIBERAL MEDIA REALIZE THAT WESTERN COUNTRIES ARE AT RISK OF JIHAD WILL THE FIGHT FINALLY BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY.

(Iraq was the right idea but the wrong move. Instead of going to war in their countries, it is safer and cheaper to kick them out of ours).

2006-08-10 02:23:37 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

could it be possible and would it even help there?

2006-08-10 02:22:41 · 8 answers · asked by Charles Dobson Focus on the Fam 2

2006-08-10 02:10:41 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

We the americans ( not including the treasonous bush administration or the republicans ) are sorry for the actions of the republicans and their president. Were sorry for all the innocents that our illegal government has killed.
Please dont blame or hold the rest of us accountable for the insidious actions of our illegal president.
Most of us ( especially the ones that didnt vote for him) do not agree with his actions and want him to pull our troops out and not to invad any more of your countries.
But our cries fall on the deaf ears of a president that cares less about the american people than he cares for your people.

2006-08-10 02:07:52 · 17 answers · asked by Charles Dobson Focus on the Fam 2

2006-08-10 02:02:29 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-08-10 01:57:14 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous