Many liberals appear not to take the wider, global battle against Islamic fanaticism seriously. They see Iraq purely as a symptom of a cynical and politicized right-wing response to Sept. 11, as opposed to a tragic misstep in a bigger conflict.
In fact, JIHAD has been waged against the West since Muhammad died only 1,400 years ago.
Saudi Arabia and Pakistan don't like the methods of Al Qaeda because they prefer the strategic long-term tactic of INVASION BY IMMIGRATION.
In 1968, liberals refused to acknowledge the Communist threat. Today, recent events point to the growing influence within the Left that is unmoved by the fight against global jihad.
ONLY WHEN THE LEFT AND THE LIBERAL MEDIA REALIZE THAT WESTERN COUNTRIES ARE AT RISK OF JIHAD WILL THE FIGHT FINALLY BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY.
(Iraq was the right idea but the wrong move. Instead of going to war in their countries, it is safer and cheaper to kick them out of ours).
2006-08-10
02:23:37
·
11 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
That brings up the whole multi-culturalism (read Balkanization) v assimilation debate doesn't it?
I absolutely believe that anyone who thinks the way things are done in Cameldungistan or wherever else it is they felt they had to leave, is so much better than the way we do things here in the west should be encouraged to repatriate themselves post haste.
BTW Islam has been at war with ALL other civilizations since Mohammad, and responsible for the eradication of several.
To this one:trevor22in
I should tell you Charles that America did not exist 1400 years ago. By west are you referring to west of the Middle East as in Europe?
Western civilization is much older that the USA bro
2006-08-10 02:44:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by Twitch 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
At least you have the honesty to declare that the tactics used were wrong and the government had no right to go to Iraq. As to your other suggestions, surely they are impractical in a world of global oneness. What would you do about the 'Europeans' in their countries?
My suggestion would be that we stop talking about multi-culturalism and separate religion from the State. People of course can practise their religions but only in their homes and places of gathering. We do not facilitate any form of religion in schools, work or play. That I believe would stop the Jihad that you speak off. Anyone who doesn't accept that can then be removed to a country where they can have religion running their lives.
2006-08-10 02:40:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
First of all, you are right, there is a major threat by muslim extremists.
But what CONSERVATIVES don't realize is that you can't just solve your problems by dropping bombs. If "The Second Iraqi war" should have taught us anything it is that invasion and extreme meathods only inflame the situation and it gives ammunition to extremist propaganda. Think about it. What happened when we kicked saddam out by force? Thousands game in to replace him. And each one of those we kill fuels the fire for THEIR propaganda. They get to say, "See? Look at what they're doing to us." And that allows them to recruit more and more extremist buddies.
What conservatives need to realize is that we need to address the extremist problem not by war (which only breeds more terrorists), but by propaganda on our side. We need to win over the hearts and minds of the people in the middle east, and slowly moderate them over time through PR. Image is everything in the world. We can never win the Iraqi war if the people think we're evil.
2006-08-10 02:39:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I should tell you Charles that America did not exist 1400 years ago. By west are you referring to west of the Middle East as in Europe?
2006-08-10 02:28:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by trevor22in 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
i think of in simple terms approximately unquestionably everyone could be in want of a closed mexican border and a lot of folk could desire to shrink immigration. We do attempt to stay out of alternative peoples employer, yet their employer in simple terms occurs to us. Like WWII. We tried to stay out of it. Then the eastern attacked us. If we could have not had a extensive armed forces buildup interior the chilly conflict then russia could have invaded europe and at last attacked us. If we go away Iraq, then Iran invades them and receives wealthy off of their oil. they are going to the be able to overthrow Saudi Arabia, which will lead them to between the main useful international locations in the international. they could then nuke Israel and attack us. we could all like to enable different international locations kill one yet another and not ought to pass to conflict to give up them, yet that isn't in any respect take place. we are able to ought to proceed to combat gruesome, brutal wars and go through rather a lot.
2016-10-01 21:45:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Leogirl, you beat me to the punch. Absolutely
2006-08-10 02:33:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Kick out? And what are you? Native American? or just trailer trash?!!
The thing is, the day "kicking out" starts, you will be the first one "out"!!
2006-08-10 05:29:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mas S 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
hell yes. and in my opinion (sorry for being politically incorrect) but Islamic nations need to be wiped off the face of the Earth. They preach about death and want to die for their flipping prophet, NOT GOD, Allah. Obviously, they won't leave us the hell alone. I don't care if they want to go and off themselves, but they need to just leave us the hell out of their sh*t.
2006-08-10 02:31:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by jollifrogs 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
yest you guys need to kick all of them out
2006-08-10 02:30:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by idontkno 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
hey jollifrogs maybe we should STAY OUT OF THEIR ****
2006-08-10 02:33:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by Charles Dobson Focus on the Fam 2
·
1⤊
0⤋