While I don't agree on all of what Ron Paul is saying, compared to other candidates, it seems to me like he would be a far better choice than any of the other candidates running. He has far more integrity and a cleaner track record than most of the others. He doesn't sugar coat the issues that are going on puts out on the table what none of the other candidates want to touch without dancing around it. Yeah, he's not a smooth talker an his fans may seem annoying to many(what other support does he have besides his fan base?), but he seems to actually care about the future of the country more than just trying to win the election. Just because he brings to light what other candidates won't, does that make him radical or crazy?
2007-12-03
15:44:14
·
11 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous