how could the towers fall at free fall speed. this is impossible. and why did the 3rd tower that fell "tower 7" fall? it wasnt hit by a plane. And a fire cant melt steal. what about bombs going off in the buildings? who would have access to the building to plant the bombs? why did it look like a demolition? have people forgot about 9/11? who benifited from 9/11?........those cowards. american government did this please research this. i cant imagine going thru life knowing that our government did this and we did absolutely nothing about it.
2007-12-03 16:41:03 · 24 answers · asked by 4knowreason 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Benjamin Chertoff, the senior researcher at Popular Mechanics who is behind the article? American Free Press har learned that he is none other than a cousin of Michael Chertoff, the new Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security. This means that Hearst paid Benjamin Chertoff to write an article supporting the seriously flawed explanation that is based on a practically non-existent investigation of the terror event that directly led to the creation of the massive national security department his cousin now heads. This is exactly the kind of journalism one would expect to find in a dictatorship like that of Saddam Hussein's Iraq."
2007-12-03 17:01:46 · update #1
Anyone with any amount of commen sense would easily realize that 911 was false flag terrorism. "Operation Northwoods" is all the proof you need. Truth is, the mainstream media darlings throw out the propaganda, and the masses eat it up like it's the gospal truth. It government controlled media you fools!
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/northwoods.html
2007-12-03 17:04:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 6⤋
I doubt it was that well organized or thought out. Republicans aren't that smart. But Baby Bush did look the other way until we got attacked - and then he used it to just phuque us sideways with his sleazy republican Patriot Act and the reshuffling of the government into his little Nazi "Homeland Security". There's a definite reason that somebody bought the Supreme Court to put that worthless little psycho in the White House - and he's screwed this country probably more than any president ever.
2016-05-28 02:34:51 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not another one of you paranoid "truthers". tower 7 probably fell from debris falling hundreds of feet and weakened the structural steel. The towers collapsed due to the enormous amount of weight above them and when the steel (weakened by the jet fuel fire) eventually gave way, all that mass gained a huge amount of force and gravity took over from there. The fact that the government planned this doesn't make sense seeing as they can't get the sidewalks paved yet can mastermind elaborate schemes to destroy the twin towers. There is only so much madness a man can take.
2007-12-03 16:48:27 · answer #3 · answered by Doctor Slernon 3 · 5⤊ 1⤋
How do you personally know that it's impossible for the towers to fall as you say? What degree qualifies you to say that?
And if fire doesn't melt steal - what exactly does melt steal?
Re: loading up the implosion bombs in the buildings...look at what they do to implode old Las Vegas casinos. They drill holes into very specifically measured places and wire everything up for the count down. Wouldn't it be suspicious to have drilled holes with wires sticking out all over those buildings??
Please get a real problem.
2007-12-03 16:48:27 · answer #4 · answered by Stan W 5 · 7⤊ 1⤋
Or how about a plane flying into them creating an explosion leaking fuel all over causing the steal to weaken thus causing the towers to fall.
2007-12-03 19:49:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Boring
2007-12-03 18:03:01 · answer #6 · answered by A Balrog of Morgoth 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
How about... you research it?
A) No, that fire couldn't melt steel. But it heated it enough that it lost a good deal of tensile strength.
B) Exactly, there are people in and out of the building all day.
C) Air pressure forced all the windows out of the floor when one collapsed. Air does that.
2007-12-03 16:47:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 1⤋
You are dumber than dumb.
What did you expect the buildings to look like after the airplanes struck, for them to tip over? There were not built with building blocks?
Why do keep asking the same question over and over again? Are you not getting enough attention at home?
How did you graduate high school?
2007-12-03 16:45:41 · answer #8 · answered by wichitaor1 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
OH MY GOD.. I've never seen this before, you are so original. Can you see the sarcasm or do I need to point out that all this evidence has been debunked, the theorists are morons and well you are reposting this drivel after all.
2007-12-03 16:58:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Why do people believe this? What writers and web sites are putting out these conspiracy theories? I suppose people actualy believe in alien invasions, too. It is obvious what the cause was.
2007-12-03 16:44:08 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
if you really believe it then why do you do NOTHING ?
because you know it's not true maybe ? :)
steel can be weakened by fire - enough so that it's load carrying capabilities would fail
how can it be "impossible" if we all watched it happen on T.V. ?
2007-12-04 05:00:44 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋