2007-12-03 13:55:31 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I love these horribly biased questions, they really show the poster's character. To answer your bigoted question though, probably Hilary or Obama, though if Hilary screws up, Edwards might get his foot through the door.
2007-12-03 14:00:20 · answer #1 · answered by S P 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
I believe that Americans are ready for a change. In fact we are going to see some previously safe Republican seats go to the Democrats this election cycle.
I believe that Mrs. Clinton represents the status quo, I don't see the drive from Mr. Obama because he doesn't see to want it enough. John Edwards is the candidate I am supporting and recommend you review his platform at the sources link to his website.
In a spirit of bipartisanism (if that is a word) my analysis of Rudy is that he would have been a better candidate if he stopped pretending to be a republican. It is too bad because Democrats are much more forgiving of sex scandals.
Romney if you were a conscientious objector during Vietnam don't be a hyprocrite and keep supporting this unwinnable war.
I had a lot of respect for McCain....... in 2000!!! Tancredo and Hunter are hate mongerers. If it is possible to find a candidate with a worse economic plan than Bush it would be Ron Paul.
Personally I have been impressed by Huckabee. I have been seeing news reports where he has shown compassion and behave like a Christian (before he was a candidate). He's doomed.
2007-12-03 14:37:07 · answer #2 · answered by mickbw 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
There isn't anything even hinting that any democrat is a shoe in. Seems pretty much a toss up at this point. I would, however, be willing to bet a couple of paychecks that Hillary will not be prez.
2007-12-03 14:17:17 · answer #3 · answered by bootedbylibsx2 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think it will be a democrat too. The media apparently wants Hillary to win, maybe Obama. They focus so much more attention on them. I think the media will choose the victor this way.
2007-12-03 16:49:25 · answer #4 · answered by Marlena 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Senator Clinton.
2007-12-03 14:02:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Stop drinking the Kool-Aid man, that stuff is dangerous! Broaden your horizon and get off of the left-winged websites. Watch the debates- BOTH sides. All polls show Rudy beating Clinton if it came down to those two. Huckabee is going to win Iowa. I wonder how much Clinton paid to have that "hostage crisis" planted??
2007-12-03 14:17:58 · answer #6 · answered by J. Jude 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
The only "obvious" contender Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton.
2007-12-03 13:58:26 · answer #7 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋
I'm sorry to say it isn't obvious. In fact the next President will be a white, male republican. America is not yet ready for a woman or a black President.
2007-12-03 14:07:28 · answer #8 · answered by Robert S 5 · 0⤊ 4⤋
If we Democrats nominate strategically, we should win.
If we nominate either of the present top two, we can't win.
2007-12-03 14:24:02 · answer #9 · answered by ildonkle 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Rudy
2007-12-03 14:03:38 · answer #10 · answered by Yo it's Me 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋