Elections - October 2007

http://www.pollingreport.com/cong_dem.htm


http://www.pollingreport.com/cong_rep.htm

2007-10-21 06:50:34 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

When Mitt Romney ran for election as the governor of Massachusetts, a typically Pro-Democrat state, he was pro-abortion and pro-gay right to marriage.

Now that Romney is running for the Republican Party ticket for president, in order to appease the general platform of his party, Romney is anti-abortion and anti-gay right to marriage.

Which set of beliefs does Romney actually adhere to; do you believe he changed his stance to merely to win the Republican Party ticket for president? Will Romney's actions if elected president contradict his new platform, as Arnold Schwartzenegger has changed since he has been in office?

2007-10-21 06:41:52 · 4 answers · asked by MenifeeManiac 7

2007-10-21 06:23:06 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-21 06:13:34 · 5 answers · asked by sergio g 1

2007-10-21 01:43:32 · 18 answers · asked by the.texican 3

I am in the UK so I don't really know.

2007-10-21 00:42:14 · 15 answers · asked by gumtrunk 2

Boy oh boy is he laying it on thick for the conservative hub of the GOP. It is quite funny actually, to hear all this talk of his belief in god and all this praying he does. Well let's look at the fact's here shall we? Between him and his new wife they have a total of 6 marriges, he loves to dress up like Marilyn Monroe and as female cabaret dancers, supports abortion and gay marrige (although he wont come out and say it) but would like to be considered the moral compass for the GOP. Wow, he really is a nutcase. This guy is killing me, he might just be the fakest of all potential candidates. What a maniacle bunch of people we have running in 08. Only one that I see that I can say I want that person in office is Ron Paul. God help us all.

2007-10-21 00:41:02 · 6 answers · asked by The Angry Dutchman 3

Do you think it is proud for Indians?

2007-10-20 23:09:39 · 8 answers · asked by ? 3

I hope Sammy Kershaw won.

2007-10-20 22:28:03 · 3 answers · asked by MASTERMIKE2004 2

(of all the candidates)
Who are you voting for?
Why?
Who do you think has the greatest chance of winning?


(Don't respond if your unsure, or you aren't voting!!!)

2007-10-20 22:13:41 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

Vote for Ron Paul 2008!
Revolution
Our Only Hope!

2007-10-20 19:52:30 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-20 19:30:19 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

It's towards the bottom of this story:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071021/ap_po/louisiana_governor

Was it also a referendum on the poor job the Democrat governor did during Katrina?

2007-10-20 18:18:16 · 4 answers · asked by Yahoo Answer Angel 6

It seems they start earlier and earlier, doesn't it?

2007-10-20 16:24:22 · 5 answers · asked by Eloise 3

What if the GOP contenders are in a 3 way tie between, Romney, Giuliani, and whoever else, who will get the nomination? Doesnt the winner need over a certain percentage, what if no one is a clear winner, and a deadlock, who will be the nominee?

2007-10-20 16:17:04 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

The State of Washington has Caucuses (Open) & Primary. What does that mean? What is Open and Closed referring to?

I noticed that the ability to change your "Party registration" has ended for 2 states and is ending this month for another, and 3 more are ending next month.

If you are Not registered with the right Party for the person you want to vote for, you will Not be able to vote for them in the Primary.

You can only vote for him in the main November '08 election IF your candidate gets on the ballot in the Republican or Democrat Primary - if your candidate is in one of these two Parties.

http://www.ronpaul2008.com/primary-and-caucus-information/

2007-10-20 16:16:15 · 6 answers · asked by Naturescent 4

or does he have some psychological problems.

2007-10-20 15:24:00 · 7 answers · asked by ? 6

I honestly think he could win over some Republican voters if he presented himself the way The Rock does. Honestly, I'd tune in to all his press conferences and everything.

2007-10-20 14:54:05 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

Does this mean it is the end for Giuliani?
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/10/20/romney.values/index.html#cnnSTCText

2007-10-20 14:31:21 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

For a start, none of them are qualified economists, interest rates are set independently by the reserve bank, and the dollar's value is determined by the market.

The Labour team knows as much about managing the economy as the Coalition did when they got into power. The difference is, the Government is currently being irresponsible with OUR money by trying to buy our vote. Giving exorbitant tax cuts will only fuel inflation and minimise the funds available for important areas the Government has neglected, such as Health and Education.

And lets not forget that it was a Labour government that initiated the changes to economic policy that have brought down interest rates, held off inflation and increased the value of the dollar.

Australians need to stop listening to the Government's political rhetoric and analyse the facts for themselves. If people do this, and do not fall into the Government's "fear of change" campaign, I think they are likely to see a need for new Leadership.

2007-10-20 14:18:35 · 13 answers · asked by thinker 1

Romney wins straw polls a Christian values summitt.
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/10/20/romney.values/index.html#cnnSTCText

2007-10-20 14:14:51 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-20 13:31:17 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

This will be my first time voting for the Presidential Primary November 2008.

I have a candidate in a party that I like very much and would hope to see them win the nomination but am wondering what I can do?

I am not too familiar with the caucus (Iowa, etc,) and what it means for the nominee. Does that particular State vote for them? Is there a way I can?

Please list the best actions to take.

Thank You

2007-10-20 12:57:30 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

Hillary is still trying to get a national medical plan passed. She worked on this for eight years while Bill was president and now 7 years with Bush as president and she still can not get anyone to vote with her. She supported the recent effort to get medical care for kids expanded - DO YOU KNOW WHAT THAT INCLUDED? It would have made tax payers supported medical care available to illegal aliens! Don't you think if Clinton wants to help the American tax payer she would avoid channeling our tax money into programs supporting illegal aliens? Maybe this is another program she voted YES on without reading it; as she did in voting us into Iraq. Shouldn’t we be telling Clinton, Obama, Edwards and those republican candidates opposing these three that anything they do that supports illegal immigration or immigrants will result in lost votes? It appears the lead Democratic and the lead Republican candidates both support illegal immigration – look at their records; they are not for the common working person!

2007-10-20 12:05:57 · 16 answers · asked by Dallen B 5

English people are not able to to what the rest of the world does, which is separate Bush from the American people. The English assume that we are pro Bush. They think, we voted him in office. We operate out of an electoral college system and not individual votes. It is possible for a candidate to have more votes as still lose the presidential race. GB cannot relate to this. Bush has humiliated the USA time and time again. He is disliked by many in his own party. He is intentionally trying to weaken the moral fiber of America to implement his One World Government. His father talked about it, and he is trying to actualize it. The world hates him, and we know that it gives us a bad name nationally. However, If Arabs can say that Americans are nice but Bush is the devil, why can't our So-Called ally. Should you all be judged by the action of your leaders, or does (commom sense) dictate that I delineate between the two. "Wisdom has eluded her children."

2007-10-20 12:03:05 · 12 answers · asked by shawnLacey 4

Every answer I see written from Liberal voters always focuses on money and interest rates. Obviously they aren't concerned about climate change, environment, hospitals, education, workers rights, Indigenous people and healthcare. Do they want Nuclear power station in their backyard? Don't they care about the future of their childre and the conditions they will live in? I am genuinely concerned with the people that only vote based on their wallet size. Its a real shame that money has been made more important that our health and the future of our children? You cannot be truly concerned about these issues and vote Liberal.

2007-10-20 11:15:08 · 11 answers · asked by Surfa101 2

what a G**D*** lair.

2007-10-20 11:04:26 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWfIhFhelm8&eurl=http://www.infowars.com/articles/economy/imf_badmouths_dollar_open_attack_on_american_middle_class.htm

2007-10-20 10:24:01 · 4 answers · asked by Liberty against the NWO 3

2007-10-20 09:55:46 · 12 answers · asked by Dk2432 2

2007-10-20 09:43:44 · 5 answers · asked by nice too meet you. 4