Elections - March 2007

2007-03-02 01:08:21 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

this will interesting

2007-03-02 00:46:15 · 13 answers · asked by misspookett 4

2007-03-02 00:39:02 · 11 answers · asked by J.D 1

2007-03-02 00:32:18 · 13 answers · asked by J.D 1

What happens if we vote for an MP who has promised to support
say (just for example) A ban on men waring underpants in the park. But, when it comes to a vote in the house of parliment supports the continued practice of men wearing underpants in the park. This is surely a break down of trust between the electorate and the MP. The MP has put his party before the electorate and what is worse has lied to obtain a position of power. Abstaining would also be a break down in trust to the people that voted him in.

2007-03-02 00:26:07 · 9 answers · asked by Redmonk 6

2007-03-02 00:22:52 · 8 answers · asked by 5470 1

the election process of selecting some national and local officials especially the president and vice president is too long and and seems too complicated and cost so much money. is there some ideas that we can simplify it and make it effective. i think this long process also makes some candidates spend too much money to the point of them being open to some big corporations and individuals influences.

2007-03-02 00:22:39 · 2 answers · asked by livinhapi 6

2007-03-02 00:21:07 · 4 answers · asked by 5470 1

2007-03-01 22:28:37 · 5 answers · asked by Burn Obama in effigy. 1

She's a proud American of Hispanic descent who opposes illegal immigration. I like her!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/usnw/20070209/pl_usnw/mexican_legislators_will_travel_to_chicago_to_visit_elvira_arellano

http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/251943,CST-NWS-pulido11.article

2007-03-01 21:24:03 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous

believe there are five main alternatives:
1. state funding via taxes (according to percentage of votes in previous elections)
2. unlimited (if you can't enforce any rules, why have limitations at all)
3. obligatory media access (each newspaper and TV & radio station has to give the top three parties one free-of-charge double-page/half-hour per week during that month and a 4th for the rest/minor parties + they have to answer each others questions at publicized debates)
4. personal finances only (barr all companies & organisations from donating)
5. off the deposits (use the deposits that all must pay to enter to finance the whole thing)
Which one or combination is best at producing a well-informed electorate and an as impartial as humanly possible (rather than bribed up) legislature?

2007-03-01 21:18:55 · 13 answers · asked by profound insight 4

2007-03-01 21:01:50 · 2 answers · asked by stargazer 1

2007-03-01 20:56:11 · 3 answers · asked by stargazer 1

Dems:

Have you heard of presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich (D)? Would you vote for him in 2008 if he got through the primaries?

Reps:

Have you heard of presidential candidate Ron Paul (R)? Would you vote for him in 2008 if he got through the primaries?

2007-03-01 20:53:34 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

He announced it again on Letterman and he is supposedly going to announce it again for everybody who has already forgotten or could care less. Is he mental?

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/politics/20070301-0501-mccain-2008.html

2007-03-01 20:05:35 · 5 answers · asked by Specialist McKay 4

2007-03-01 19:38:41 · 14 answers · asked by deepak 1 1

2007-03-01 16:58:22 · 7 answers · asked by DAVAY 3

It seems as if the topics of gay marriage, abortion, stem cell research, alternative fuel sources, global warming, education, universal healthcare, seeking world peace, why do we still have the Income tax, how come Clinton got impeached for oral sex but Bush isn't for starting a war and yet wasn't able to find any evidence of WMD and much more are never really answered but are continually left unresolved. Will a stronger candidate ever arise to tackle these issues or will we simply be left with the limelight seeking, lukewarm, candidates of today?

2007-03-01 16:37:43 · 3 answers · asked by Harrison M 1

i sure would ALL PRAISES TO ALAH DEATH TO AMERICA! DEATH TO THE INFIDELS!

2007-03-01 16:20:14 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Barack Obama?
A Black Female?
A White Female?
Bill Clinton?
Im leaning more towards the Clinton/Obama ticket

2007-03-01 16:17:45 · 19 answers · asked by TNA Ambassador 6

2007-03-01 16:11:34 · 11 answers · asked by 5470 1

He's 45 years old. He has been in the U.S. Senate for 2 years. He was in the Illinois legislative for a few more than than. Does the radical left wing really think Barack Hussein Obama can win in 2008 if nominated?

2007-03-01 16:00:10 · 13 answers · asked by gayconservativ 3

Obviously not first lady...

2007-03-01 15:34:10 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

In the spirit of the upcoming election, who in your opinion is more Fergalicious?
1.) Hillary Clinton

-or-

2.) Barack Obama

2007-03-01 15:15:58 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

please help answer this

2007-03-01 14:39:48 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-01 14:07:54 · 3 answers · asked by arem caezar n 1

The man doesn't read newspapers. While claiming (all of a sudden) that he reads about 3 books a day, he clearly has rarely read any book, including My Pet Goat, cover to cover. And he got through various schools only because of his family name and influence. Naming a library after Bush has got to be the oxymoron of the century.

2007-03-01 13:14:11 · 21 answers · asked by golfer7 5

we have a first in our history. we have a black person and a woman running for the white house.

so I reach out to each group and ask. what would be the good points of either a black guy or white woman in the white house?

not the candidates themselves but the race and gender qualities.

2007-03-01 13:03:31 · 7 answers · asked by fay v 2

2007-03-01 13:02:39 · 16 answers · asked by houston_texaz713 1

2007-03-01 12:38:48 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous