English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

He announced it again on Letterman and he is supposedly going to announce it again for everybody who has already forgotten or could care less. Is he mental?

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/politics/20070301-0501-mccain-2008.html

2007-03-01 20:05:35 · 5 answers · asked by Specialist McKay 4 in Politics & Government Elections

5 answers

Who's John McCain?

2007-03-02 07:54:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

He's trying to remind people that he wasn't just the guy who Bush stabbed in the back in 2000. Right now, people are focused on Hillary and Obama, and the Republican is unimportant, because it's either a vote for the Democrat or against. At least, that's how the trend is at the moment.

The truth of the matter is, any candidate needs as much face time as possible. McCain is trying to get his name back out there, and hopefully become the mainstream media darling he was in 2000 before he ran out of steam. He's probably quite afraid that Giuliani will capitalise on his charisma and 9-11 experience in order to win the nomination, or that Condoleezza Rice will announce candidacy, who would combine minority, female, and Bush legacy, the latter of which remains at least somewhat popular in the Republican camp.

It's the same reason they pump us full of ads from every direction for a full year of election campaigning. The more an undecided person hears a name, the more they lean towards that name.

2007-03-01 21:13:12 · answer #2 · answered by BDOLE 6 · 0 0

He badly needs the publicity. Just give a little understanding.
You can show your support for John McCain in the 2008 presidential race by being a joining http://www.isupportthismessage.com

2007-03-05 08:20:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No, on Letterman he was announcing his announcement of possibly being voted as the guy who may get to run for President.

I hope this clears things up! ???

2007-03-01 20:23:30 · answer #4 · answered by amg503 7 · 0 0

no i dont think of so, hes consistently been supportive of the conflict and troops. reason maximum professional conflict Reps. blame Dems. is using the fact proscribing troops and money isn't devoting youself a hundred% to the conflict wich do influence the out come, maximum Dems. desire to decrease materials or troops or in basic terms stop all investment all jointly. i think of the DoD has untill July untill they are going to be compelled to coach our troops in hand to gun try against if investment isn't recieved. I dont strategies going to Iraq, yet i might desire to take an M16 with me

2016-10-17 02:11:42 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers