Current Events - February 2007

I'm feeling really frustrated with our current Pro-Democrat NALC leadership, am I the only one?

2007-02-22 15:09:35 · 4 answers · asked by Kester 2

Will they realize that democrats and republicans are identical as far as the results we get? There may be some social issues they differ on, but that is it. We live in an oligarchy. the people we elect answer to the world elite - the world bankers and globalists, and the federal reserve must be disbanded.

9/11 was an inside job. It has been proven.

2007-02-22 15:08:28 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-02-22 14:40:21 · 18 answers · asked by ? 3

We know Iraq is an illegal war. We know he cooked the intelligence prior to invading Iraq. We know about the downing street memo. We know there were not weapons of mass destructions. We know 9/11 was an inside job.

Why would we preemptively invade Iran?

2007-02-22 14:37:26 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

JUST ASKING
PLEASE NO IMPOLITE ANSWERS
" " RUDE " '"

2007-02-22 14:28:48 · 13 answers · asked by butterfly18 3

please.. star my question... PLEASE?

2007-02-22 14:24:38 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-02-22 13:46:25 · 26 answers · asked by ♥ ♥ C.J. ♥ ♥ 5

2007-02-22 13:36:34 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

READER: Over the last few months, many of your readers have posted some very plausible scenarios as to how the Bush administration might seek to initiate and or justify hostilities with Iran.

Most of those submissions highlighted the role of a country that has a stellar history for undertaking false flag operations. Since both the UK and the US are prisoners of the same puppet master, events may transpire in the following manner.

1) Phoney-Toney reduces the number of British Military personnel in Southern Iraq

2) Prince Harry is deployed to Basra

3) UK SAS forces, excuse me Iranian Assassins with heavy Israeli accents, kidnap and threaten the prince

4) UK (sweet Toney) asks America (boyfriend George) for help

5) all roads, according to CNN, point to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

6) glass becomes plentiful in what was formerly called Tehran

7) non-stop celebrations erupt in Tel Aviv

8) fifty years from now everyone dies of cancer

2007-02-22 13:22:44 · 7 answers · asked by Peace F 2

Oh yeah, that's right, if they are actually testing it, then it's too late ....

2007-02-22 13:06:19 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

The mexican experience will NOT include slavery so we will not have to listen to years of stories about white men beating them, and at least they were paid to work in the fields...and pick crops and vegetables.

2007-02-22 13:03:08 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-02-22 12:48:15 · 8 answers · asked by Mike T 2

2007-02-22 12:46:34 · 14 answers · asked by blabla 2

why or why not what methods would you use?

2007-02-22 12:23:26 · 9 answers · asked by animallover1965 1

I don't mean to be disrespectful but isn't there something else going on that is more important then this right now? Like our troops dying daily in Iraq or the presidential election or the nuclear devlopments in Iran? Something has got to be more important then Anna and Brittany!!

2007-02-22 12:17:05 · 12 answers · asked by Hootervilletrouble 2

2007-02-22 12:04:00 · 4 answers · asked by mn 1

every great empire has fallen.... we are no exception, and it's going to happen soon if we keep up our all our bullcrap.... every country will want us gone not just the few who want us gone today

2007-02-22 11:48:53 · 18 answers · asked by Mike T 2

As a libertarian I completely sympathize with the arguments made against our occupation because they're based on the assumption that America is there for the here and now. Oil, democracy, Bush's legacy, yada yada yada. We've all heard this, but the fact of the matter is that there are much more important things out there than the here and now.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070222/ts_n...

When Yahoo! decides to post this story on the front page, you know that there are celebrations going on across the board over our pull out in Iraq. That's right, I said Iraq. Yahoo! wouldn't post this if the issue was Afghanistan since it would make it appear as pro-terror.

Regardless, by pulling out of Iraq, the US will be telling the world that our image isn't backed by character and that we had been clueless in our operations all along. Departure will make a huge chink in our credibility (more than our entry and campaign).

2007-02-22 11:27:03 · 2 answers · asked by Mikey C 5

2007-02-22 11:14:00 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

with that freaky ruling. If the judge is just going to arbitrarily disregard the law I think he should be locked up (then he really would have something to cry about). I think the judge should get tested for drugs.

2007-02-22 11:12:49 · 18 answers · asked by victorschool1 5

As a libertarian I completely sympathize with the arguments made against our occupation because they're based on the assumption that America is there for the here and now. Oil, democracy, Bush's legacy, yada yada yada. We've all heard this, but the fact of the matter is that there are much more important things out there than the here and now.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070222/ts_nm/afghan_hekmatyar_dc

When Yahoo! decides to post this story on the front page, you know that there are celebrations going on across the board over our pull out in Iraq. That's right, I said Iraq. Yahoo! wouldn't post this if the issue was Afghanistan since it would make it appear as pro-terror.

Regardless, by pulling out of Iraq, the US will be telling the world that our image isn't backed by character and that we had been clueless in our operations all along. Departure will make a huge chink in our credibility (more than our entry and campaign).

2007-02-22 11:12:46 · 1 answers · asked by Mikey C 5

When Prince Harry, third in line to the British Throne, is dragged from his Saracen and beheaded on the internet, should we invade Iraq?

2007-02-22 11:07:23 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

I am from the U.S. but I'm just curious to know if it is actually the people here that most people dislike or our government. I'm sure you can find good and bad people wherever you go.....thanks for the poll!

2007-02-22 11:02:24 · 24 answers · asked by Still Confused 1

Any liberal who questions the war for freedom, or attacks Pres Bush's policies are ideological terrorists, and must be arrested. Criticism of the President in time of war is a threat to freedom.
Real Americans recognize liberals are terrorist sypathizers (and are terrorists themselves) So WHY arent we rounding the liberals up? I encourage concervatives to do thier part- if you see a liberal questioning the president or the war, perform a citizens arrest. I saw a man with at an an anti american protest sign- and i gave him a knuckle sandwich. Liberalism IS terrorism, and the true war on terror needs to be against the liberal terrorists here at home.
Start with arresting ACLU & NAACP members.
Anti American news papers like the NY Times need to be shut down, and thier reporters arrested. Liberalism- and liberals have got to go.They promote anti americanism, anti freedom, perversion and athism. America is a Christian nation, and a free nation, and we must arrest all enemies of freedom

2007-02-22 10:59:12 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

Recall the incident in Beslan, Russia? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beslan_school_hostage_crisis
http://www.moscowhelp.org/en/index.html

Al Queda claimed responsiblity and Usama Bin Laden promised this was going to happen to the US, many times over.

Was Beslan a dress-reharsal? Do you think it could happen where you live? Why or why not? What can we do about it?

2007-02-22 10:54:08 · 8 answers · asked by Z-Force920 3

2007-02-22 10:54:04 · 16 answers · asked by David A 1

2007-02-22 10:52:25 · 7 answers · asked by morgan b 1

The British have been a good allies of the US because they do as they're told- But Blair now wants to pull Britrish troops out of Iraq- an act which gives aid and comfort to the enemy.
If Blair does this, its like stabbing America in the back, and he should be held accountable.
I think that the Americans soldiers should arrrest any British soldiers that try to leave.
How should Bush punish england if they turn chicken? Mabye boycott all British imports- I think Blair should be threated with arrest. We need to stay in Iraq until we win, and we have not won until all the terrorist are killed.
The British, Australiands and canadians should remain in Iraq as long as PRESIDENT BUSH says so. HE is boss- other nations need to remember this..

2007-02-22 10:47:59 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

Thought it would be interesting to get some opinions of this ....as for the previous months while it was unseasonably calm gas prices were doing a yo-yo impresonation but are now just going up and up......

2007-02-22 10:36:37 · 4 answers · asked by Akkita 6

2007-02-22 10:22:18 · 4 answers · asked by iNeedhelp 4