Current Events - November 2006

Surrending would shame us, and would be like a boost to the terrorists. Plus all the fighting would be for naught.

Changing the strategy would make Bush a liar, etc, etc.

Staying there would only make more die.

Do you suggest we go have a nice "chat" with the terrorists and ask them nicely not to attack anyone anymore?

I've been looking at some of the questions, and many are extremely opposed to the war and attack it with BS evidence, yet no one proposes an alternative.

Your time to shine, Dems.

2006-11-11 04:16:17 · 5 answers · asked by Picard Facepalm 5

2006-11-11 04:13:36 · 15 answers · asked by Bapboy 4

Some are claiming that Georgie tarnish the title. Now they want to be called Republican or Conservatives again. So, George did not only mess up the country's image, he tainted his own parties ideology as well.

2006-11-11 04:05:24 · 4 answers · asked by nemesis 4

Why are they doing this? It doesn't seem necessary to me

2006-11-11 03:31:49 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

to the others ?

2006-11-11 03:28:51 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

The Archbishop of York has condemned what he called the systematic erosion of Christianity from public life.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6138486.stm

what does everyone think of this?

2006-11-11 02:42:17 · 19 answers · asked by northukstudent 3

since 9/11/01

2006-11-11 02:24:27 · 6 answers · asked by thebner87 1

2006-11-11 02:03:47 · 9 answers · asked by Reo 5

Did Bin Laden give any specific details? Was it the cancellation of the Afghan Oil Pipeline 20 days before? US's overbearing culture and world politics? Geroge HW Bush's New World Order Speach on a pervious Sept. 11? Our Infidelity? I would love to hear from muslims, arabs, fundamentalists(Christian, Jewish, or Islamic), but anyone is welcome to answer.

2006-11-11 01:22:44 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

Please Answer by YES or NO.
According to a study by Johns Hopkins University and Iraq’s Al-Mustansiriyah University researchers Which was published in The Lancet medical journal last month that the war in Iraq has caused between 420,000 and 790,000 Iraqi deaths & more than 2800 American military deaths.
It’s a staggering number.
This report is more evidence of the daily tragedy in Iraq. Each life lost carries with it lost hopes, loves, and dreams. Each life lost is another reason that the war in Iraq must end.
Till now, Bush & his administration , wanting to keep a positive spin on Iraq news coverage,
but whether 40,000, 100,000 or 500,000 people have died in Iraq, this war has cost too many human lives. The only resposibility for these lost innocent human lives are belong to Bush & his administration. I am asking all the honest people around the globe to give equitable answer by one word YES if they agree or NO if they disagree about that.

2006-11-11 01:17:26 · 14 answers · asked by Muzaffer E 1

2006-11-11 00:15:36 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-10 19:47:28 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-10 19:18:01 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

they need all the money they can raise

This year, the Legion is offering you a different way to give to the Poppy Appeal! By texting the word POPPY to 85099, you can download one of three Poppy images to your mobile phone in return for a donation of £1.50

http://www.poppy.org.uk/

2006-11-10 19:16:10 · 8 answers · asked by ♥gigi♥ 7

2006-11-10 18:30:35 · 22 answers · asked by http://hogshead.pokerknave.com/ 6

They defended NAMBLA (the North American Man-Boy Love Association.) They claimed that it was NAMBLA's first amendment freedom-of-speech right to teach pedophiles how to successfully rape a child and get away with it.

2006-11-10 16:51:17 · 8 answers · asked by short stuff 2

We've heard how bad Osama Bin Laden (of Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Pakistan... and all his other hideouts) is, how bad Saddam Hussein (of Iraq) is, and how bad Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (of Iran) is; but I wonder if Kim Jung (of North Korea) is the illest. He has nuclear weapons already and has fired a few of them with the threat to America and S. Korea (and who knows how many others) of using these nuclear weapons on them. It seems everyone is worried about Iran who doesn't yet have fully-developed nuclear weapons (atleast that's what some say) when Little Kim is no little man at all. Bush told him, "If'n u dohn gi' 'em up, thien wur comina gitcha." Mr. Kim replied, "Come and get it." I would have to say Mr. Kim Jung is the Illest of them all.

2006-11-10 16:41:57 · 5 answers · asked by Asher 2

1. Talibani
2. al-Maliki
3. Saddam
4. Bush
5. Cheyney
6. Sistani

2006-11-10 16:17:28 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Give me good answers not bad ones.

2006-11-10 16:06:39 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

My goodness, did you ever think you'd see the day that people would be "disappeared" by the USA? Tortured by the USA?

I've been calling for war crimes charges against Bush and his fellow gangsters for years.

Still, I'd rather we'd have done it here in America, rather than having our gang be charged in Europe.

You?

Here's an article on the detainees seeing justice:
http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_4638767

2006-11-10 14:53:51 · 5 answers · asked by cassandra 6

I totally disagree with the BNP views but totally agree with the “not guilty” verdict

2006-11-10 14:10:54 · 18 answers · asked by toietmoi 6

A person can view documentaries on Disease, War, Religion, Politics, History, you name it. Greed is so previlent in the World and yet no one on TV is even allowed to mention the word. Why is it taboo?

2006-11-10 13:15:24 · 12 answers · asked by The professor 4

2006-11-10 13:11:49 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

Are we going to cut and run if Hamas and his crazy loons do attack us? Or are we going to attack back if we get attacked first?? If you haven't read the news, Israel's artillery barrage accidentally struck a residential area killing 18 Palestine’s. Hamas is calling for revenge against the U.S. and Israel.

2006-11-10 13:09:03 · 12 answers · asked by TJ 4

2006-11-10 12:07:00 · 13 answers · asked by punkyboy969 2

dose anyone know if Gerald LeVert died today

2006-11-10 11:37:53 · 6 answers · asked by angelaaliyahlove 1

2006-11-10 11:19:46 · 14 answers · asked by jamesdkral 3

Now, what do dems have to say about this news link?
Are dems really that naive that they beleive we can actually coexist with islamic radicals? So dems HATE Bush, hate the war and blame every social ill in America on Bush, Ok, I can handle that, some people just belly ache when things dont go their way, so now what would a dem do if islamic radicals took over Jeruslem and bombed the white house?
Would you still try to have peace talks or do you strike back?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061110/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_061110194348

2006-11-10 11:13:05 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

I want to see numbers...some kind of proof, and Yahoo makes it at the top of there news...Yahoo is such a f#cking Democrat..LOL

2006-11-10 09:37:48 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Did anyone else find it interesting that the Bush administration swore up and down that there were WMD's in Iraq; and upon not finding any focused on the "freedom of Iraqis"?

The problem I find with the whole freedom thing is the timing of the situation. If freedom was such a big concern, then why not invade earlier?

There are many other nations that do not have freedom, are they next?

What gives the United States the right to decide who gets democracy and who does not?

Does anyone else see it this way?

2006-11-10 08:56:37 · 19 answers · asked by econdrone 2