English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

We've heard how bad Osama Bin Laden (of Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Pakistan... and all his other hideouts) is, how bad Saddam Hussein (of Iraq) is, and how bad Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (of Iran) is; but I wonder if Kim Jung (of North Korea) is the illest. He has nuclear weapons already and has fired a few of them with the threat to America and S. Korea (and who knows how many others) of using these nuclear weapons on them. It seems everyone is worried about Iran who doesn't yet have fully-developed nuclear weapons (atleast that's what some say) when Little Kim is no little man at all. Bush told him, "If'n u dohn gi' 'em up, thien wur comina gitcha." Mr. Kim replied, "Come and get it." I would have to say Mr. Kim Jung is the Illest of them all.

2006-11-10 16:41:57 · 5 answers · asked by Asher 2 in News & Events Current Events

5 answers

Yes he's one of our biggest threats, and moreover should be treated as that. More of our focus/attention needs to be directed on him and his location.

2006-11-10 16:59:37 · answer #1 · answered by awesome 4 · 2 0

Well, after all his full name is Kim Jung IL, right?

2006-11-10 16:51:10 · answer #2 · answered by smarties 6 · 0 0

He is scary - very, arrogant and loves himself! Lacks any
sense of feelings for his country.

2006-11-10 16:49:30 · answer #3 · answered by floridagirl2 3 · 0 0

Good pun. Yes, he is scary but we have wasted our energy and military might on a country that wasn't even a threat to us. Thanks, George.

http://www.cutepiggy.com/george_w_bush.html

2006-11-10 16:58:40 · answer #4 · answered by notyou311 7 · 1 0

no, you are

2006-11-11 18:05:21 · answer #5 · answered by thevillageidiotxxxx 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers