Supporters of circumcision say that it needs to be done because it is healthier or more hygienic or whatever. If a foreskin was so bad and unhygienic, wouldn't evolution (or God or whatever you choose to believe) have caused men to be born without foreskins in the first place?
I really don't see how a natural and integral part of the human body can be bad for the body. Some people don't clean behind their ears properly. Our earlobes don't improve our hearing that much, should babies have their earlobes cut off?
2006-08-08
13:39:37
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous