From what I've seen (porn) it seems that all the "really long" penises are un-circumcised. (intact) To me this would make sense, using the logic that one's penis would be more freely to develop (grow more) ,from childhood, without the restriction of tight skin. An example of this restriction would be that often a circumcised penis will pull the scrotum, sometimes halfway, down the shaft to compensate for the lack of free moving skin. Also, I wonder if one's erection would be able to grow longer without the restriction of the tight skin.
please just give answers about size, I don't care about the other reasons, thank you.
PS. if you are considering to circumcise your baby then do research about reasons NOT to circumcise, instead of having an idiot reason like "mutilated d*cks look/taste better and cleaner."
2006-08-09
01:59:27
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous