From what I've seen (porn) it seems that all the "really long" penises are un-circumcised. (intact) To me this would make sense, using the logic that one's penis would be more freely to develop (grow more) ,from childhood, without the restriction of tight skin. An example of this restriction would be that often a circumcised penis will pull the scrotum, sometimes halfway, down the shaft to compensate for the lack of free moving skin. Also, I wonder if one's erection would be able to grow longer without the restriction of the tight skin.
please just give answers about size, I don't care about the other reasons, thank you.
PS. if you are considering to circumcise your baby then do research about reasons NOT to circumcise, instead of having an idiot reason like "mutilated d*cks look/taste better and cleaner."
2006-08-09 01:59:27 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Health ➔ Men's Health
response to bentworth: but maybe it would be 9" if it wasnt.?
2006-08-09 04:53:44 · update #1
response to whole feelings: No, dumb nuts you got my question backwards, my theroy is that un-circumcised is bigger because... damit read the question again.
2006-08-09 04:56:38 · update #2
I've heard that uncircumcised guys have bigger *****, I don't know why though...
Anyway, who cares, just don't get circumcised.
2006-08-11 16:06:01 · answer #1 · answered by nmagny 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Theoretically, circumcision shouldn't reduce nor enhance penis size. If it were done REALLY tight, it might restrict an erection, but a similar thing could happen if the foreskin were REALLY tight and the resulting phimosis severe. However, skin is actually a fairly flexible and stretchable thing, so regardless, it shouldn't make a difference. I don't think there's any research done on this subject either, so it's hard to know scientifically.
2006-08-09 10:20:17 · answer #2 · answered by trebla_5 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No, you’re wrong because the normal and well shaped foreskin layer doesn’t limit the penis growing, at all.
Why should it, in your opinion?
Are you thinking about the Frenulum? No, sorry it only limits the excessive foreskin opening (helping the closing) and not the penis measures! Foreskin is not a constriction and mustn’t be tight; otherwise, it just becomes a disease called Phimosis. You start form the wrong point of view that foreskin is a useless bother even restraining the growing! On the contrary, foreskin is a normal part of the penis with many important tasks.
2006-08-09 03:20:28 · answer #3 · answered by whole_feelings 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I can't see why circumcision would affect the size of the penis; but I think the glans look bigger when circumcised.
2006-08-09 19:32:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
what gets circumcised is actually a flap of skin that doesnt interfere with the growth of your penis. it just is there and is cut off for what ever reason(religus, easy sex, etc.)
2006-08-09 02:08:20 · answer #5 · answered by rugbyboygjfsd; 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
That is bull, I'm circumcised and Mine is 8 inches
2006-08-09 03:11:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
circumcizing does not inhibit penis growth. hell you can always lengthen your penis and foreskin.....
2006-08-11 20:02:14 · answer #7 · answered by mr phraze 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋