To clarify further, which do you think would be more favourably recieved?
Person A has years of formal training, paints what is considered art or accepted by the general public as something that is precise and near-photorealistic.
Person B has absolutely no training. They paint what their minds or emotions tells them, taking on their own interpretation of things, be it a flourescent landscape or an abstract and surreal still-life.
Which would you appreciate more?
2007-10-14
23:42:14
·
16 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Painting