Philosophy - December 2006

2006-12-30 06:51:30 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-30 06:47:06 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

I mean if you look at the way science has been going and the way religion/spirituality has been moving they are seperate but moving twoards the same goal. Does it require a good background in science and religion/spiritualtiy to be a philospher thats not just rambling about jibberish?

2006-12-30 06:42:07 · 6 answers · asked by magpiesmn 6

It can be anything that made you feel good about what you accomplished, how you helped someone else or made you just feel great inside.

2006-12-30 06:38:45 · 9 answers · asked by Granny Fran 5

2006-12-30 06:21:27 · 14 answers · asked by Simon G 1

2006-12-30 05:54:23 · 28 answers · asked by mom2 1

...but rather that your existence is to enter and depart from different people's lives for specific purposes? Kind of along the lines of "A reason - a season - a lifetime" theory but missing the lifetime from the mix?

2006-12-30 05:38:01 · 8 answers · asked by Just aasking 3

The more you know, the more you suffer, but greater your name is.
Find yourself in everything that surrounds you, so that you can live in harmony with nature.
Protect yourselves from yourself because he who gets caught by himself will destroy himself and those around him

2006-12-30 05:23:00 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-30 05:21:24 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-30 05:18:17 · 19 answers · asked by daliaadel 5

I very often see advice on this message board telling people that "love is a choice." I don't understand how that works -- please give examples of how when you fell out of love with your spouse you chose to fall back in love, and how you made that happen.

2006-12-30 05:16:14 · 28 answers · asked by I'm Trying 3

2006-12-30 05:15:54 · 19 answers · asked by hinrichs_tomas 1

From what I've been seeing,no.

2006-12-30 05:13:34 · 20 answers · asked by Dr. NG 7

2006-12-30 04:59:54 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-30 04:43:41 · 8 answers · asked by drow 1

Many people ascribe these to being coincidences. F. David Peat's "Synchronicity--The Bridge Between Matter and Mind" says otherwise. I agree. How about you?

2006-12-30 04:43:06 · 3 answers · asked by Martell 7

2006-12-30 04:34:26 · 5 answers · asked by sina g 1

2006-12-30 04:11:25 · 18 answers · asked by kit kat 1

WHY????????

2006-12-30 04:05:16 · 16 answers · asked by Choclate thunder 2

In other words, do things and events, philosophically-speaking, exist /take place or all phenomena is merely an expression of human thought and consciousness?

2006-12-30 03:46:27 · 17 answers · asked by ari-pup 7

2006-12-30 03:36:51 · 17 answers · asked by lil_dude7252 1

(b) how?
(c) have you ever?
(d) what would you call the unpredictable and the impossible in
your life?

2006-12-30 03:34:34 · 8 answers · asked by On It 1

....from my point of view both identities are equally made up.... one is just older then the other and with less history

2006-12-30 03:27:39 · 5 answers · asked by On It 1

from making deals with the devil to asking god for them i always have gotten what ive wanted one way or another, but its comes at a greatest price. But i want to know the answer, i'm a philosophy "want-to-er" and a thinker, i've almost always set my standards low but not always...

2006-12-30 03:18:48 · 10 answers · asked by lil_dude7252 1

Just wondering..... what society could be like if sex difference did not exist.
Secondly whose need for society is more... women's or men's.

2006-12-30 02:20:13 · 9 answers · asked by small 7

2006-12-30 01:22:42 · 53 answers · asked by Emily 2

id like to know what you thiunk from a personal and global perspective? list atleast three facts to support your claim.

2006-12-30 01:21:19 · 35 answers · asked by Silent_Watcher 1

2006-12-30 01:07:22 · 5 answers · asked by alig 3

And how to do it?

2006-12-30 00:58:44 · 19 answers · asked by eth1_hifi 2

Unless you are a suppporter of Saddam Hussein, we all know what a brutal dictator he was and that he murdered and tortured thousands of his own people. We have seen TV footage, newspaper and magzine photos, online stories, and we have had the personnal accounts of tenths of thousands of Iraqis who fled Iraq over the last 20-30 years.

If all of the above is true then why have a trial if we all knew he would be executed anyway? We all know he NEVER had a chance to win. What is your opinion?

2006-12-30 00:44:12 · 10 answers · asked by nowhere 3