History - March 2007

i have to write an essay on this

2007-03-12 05:29:29 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

please leave any sources you use

2007-03-12 05:12:16 · 10 answers · asked by david 2

2007-03-12 05:04:27 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-12 05:03:33 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-12 05:01:02 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

I NEED 1 RESULT OF THE USA'S INVOLVMENT IN WW1 HURRY PLEASE!!!!! THANKS

2007-03-12 04:56:37 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

i know the spartins loss beacuse they only had 300 men but i heard the persian had 1 million men and lost a lot of men
please tell me the outcome to the persian side of the battle

2007-03-12 04:33:49 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

how were the crusades from a christian perspective or from a crusader's perspective, what did they truly believe? Are there any primary sources to prove that they were doing it for the love of god?

2007-03-12 04:15:44 · 6 answers · asked by blubbablub 1

does anyone know the exact date on when we started world war two?

2007-03-12 04:05:46 · 8 answers · asked by CGZ UP 1

2007-03-12 03:58:11 · 6 answers · asked by Ayman 3

2007-03-12 03:47:26 · 4 answers · asked by RUTHSTARTREK 1

I'd like to hear your opinion.

2007-03-12 03:30:41 · 15 answers · asked by charlie h 3

2007-03-12 03:25:28 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

I saw the film 300, and it was mentioned that the Persian army was around the 1 million mark in numbers. Is this accurate?

2007-03-12 03:22:39 · 8 answers · asked by Frizz 2

Surely anyone who has seen Troy (2004) would argue that Hollywood does have a habit of creating thier own version of History.

However, should we just be able to enjoy a film without scrutinising its accuracy, or will our children's children have a uneducated view on past events

The floor is yours.....

2007-03-12 03:11:12 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-12 03:05:44 · 4 answers · asked by maya d 1

off which, Admiral Nelson had his last battle?
I know the Anglicised name, what was the Moorish name?

2007-03-12 02:57:34 · 1 answers · asked by busted.mike 4

I am currently writing a paper where i compare the literature during the anglo-saxon and medieval periods. However, my teacher has set some guidelines: NO wikipedia, and NO ".com's"

2007-03-12 02:54:10 · 1 answers · asked by huzzaah12 2

It has something to do with Europe around 1900. Something that lead into the German wanting to naval supremacy.

2007-03-12 02:31:03 · 1 answers · asked by andy_lawson2007 1

hey,
i have to write a debate on "ambition is man's greatest strenght" while writing against the motion. So i was wondering if someone could tell me the single most proud person in history? whose pride led to his downfall

2007-03-12 02:25:15 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

. How is Feste able to win over Olivia? Track his train of thought in their conversation.

2. How would you describe wit? What makes a statement witty? Is wit really a form of subtle humor? Why or why not?

2007-03-12 02:19:22 · 3 answers · asked by heather N 1

Seriously... Is it genetic or what?? It seems that every time a movie about a certain period or group of people comes out the majority take it as gospel and never look into the reality. It happened with Gladiator, with The Last Samurai, and now we see it with 300!! Hate to be the one to break it to you but the Germanic people's fought nekkid with only wooden spears and in the battle the movie shows they won and left only 3 men alive to return to Rome with a message not to return. The samurai did use firearms, the white guy that fought with the samurai in the Satsuma rebellion was French, and the ideal of Bushido is a very far cry from what the samurai really were. As for "300" and the Spartans I've seen someone on here post that they didn't use the phalanx and that they didn't wear armour. Yes they DID wear armour and did use the phalanx. Why can't people see movies and be inspired to investigate the reality? Why do so many blindly & stupidly take what Hollywood says as gospel?

2007-03-12 02:17:33 · 10 answers · asked by amadeus 2

please be more specific

2007-03-12 02:13:44 · 1 answers · asked by tzukii 1

2007-03-12 02:08:13 · 1 answers · asked by BobDanzig 1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_Germany

Wikipedia states:

The Kingdom of Germany was a medieval state[1] which grew out of that of East Francia in the tenth century, when the term regnum Teutonicum first came into informal use.

So did the Kingdom of Germany exist and if it did then does that mean that the German state did in fact exist before 1871.

2007-03-12 02:07:39 · 5 answers · asked by Robert P 4

Especially given our collective fascination with death

2007-03-12 02:00:33 · 4 answers · asked by steveshurtleff 4

2007-03-12 01:52:47 · 2 answers · asked by mjfox2300 1

2007-03-12 01:49:58 · 11 answers · asked by jsjmlj 5

history homework, need to know the benefits of both britain and hong kong during the colonial era 1840's to 1900's

2007-03-12 01:46:27 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-12 01:30:54 · 7 answers · asked by Jay 2