I'm writing a roughly 25 page paper on the Ontological Argument for God's existence as a writing sample for my graduate school applications. I think I have all of my bases covered in my argument, but I want to make sure. For those familiar with the argument (any version- Anselm, Descartes, Kant, Plantinga), what do you think? Is the argument valid or invalid? If valid, how? If invalid, what's the fallacy?
Note: I am NOT asking whether or not God exists, so please do not answer this question. My question is ONLY about this one specific philosophical argument.
Thanks for your input!
2007-03-20
11:18:30
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Philosophy