1) If so, what's the point of the rest of the constitution? Isn't it just redundant?
2) If Bush decides that warrant-less searches, state-sponsored religion, and corporate welfare is good for the "general welfare," doesn't that mean he's working within the constitution?
3) Does a constitutionally limited republic mean anything to you, or should we lose rights every time a slick conman can convince a slim majority of voters?
2007-10-13
18:13:32
·
9 answers
·
asked by
CaptainObvious
7
in
Politics