Can I get a hell no! Shaq's impact was waaaay larger. Kobe was just another role player that could get replaced. Shaq getting ALL 3 Finals MVPs & winning a 4th title without Kobe is proof that it wasn't a 50/50 impact. Anyways, check out thier stats in those 3 finals:
2000 NBA Finals
Shaq: 38 ppg & 16.7 rpg (final mvp)
Kobe: 15.6 ppg & 4.6 apg
Shaq has a double double & almost double Kobe in ppg. That's not 50/50. That's 80/20 Shaq.
2001 NBA Finals:
Shaq: 33.0 ppg, 15.8 rpg, 4.8 apg (final mvp)
Kobe: 24.6 ppg, 7.8 rpg, 5.8 apg
Shaq has another double double, almost average 10 more points then Kobe, & he has almost the same amount assist. That's not 50/50. That's 75/25 Shaq!
2002 NBA Finals:
Shaq: 36.3 ppg, 12.3 rpg, 3.8 apg (final mvp)
Kobe: 26.8 ppg, 5.8 rpg, 5.3 apg
Shaq has another double double & averaged more points then Kobe. That's not 50/50. That's 65/35 Shaq!
See there, Shaq is, was, & always will be the reason Kobe have 3 rings.
KOBE BRYANT SUCK!
2007-03-22
12:34:12
·
14 answers
·
asked by
jdwj76
1