As science becomes more sophisticated, researchers develop coherent theories about the workings of matter and energy. These ideas were not always on the right track, despite extensive initial evidence. For example, "the opinion of many scientists was that heat energy and work energy were different types of universal fluids that flowed from object to object as they interacted. They also believed that certain interactions required no exchange of energy at all." While these theories could be explained through evidence available at the time, they were eventually proven wrong by further discoveries. Science is not fact, but rather our attempt to best explain something with the limitations we have with regards to technology, etc.
2007-10-29
11:19:44
·
6 answers
·
asked by
jay k
6