..., nor for nothing, for we find the lack of absence….
Or:
…, nor for nothing, but that we find the lack of absence….
I’m asking because there is a question of –style for usage.
For instance, which conjoined structure sounds better? Spoken? Written?
…cutting rainforest to grow sugar-cane and high-cellulose-hemp-species as an ethanol supply will not reduce atmospheric carbon, for we know that an amount of the carbon-dioxide rainforests remove from the atmosphere ends up sediments in swampy sections and turn to coal, which is not atmospheric carbon gas and instead is rock (unless you burn it and put it back in the atmosphere!)….
Or:
…carbon-dioxide, alone, is transparent to the human eye, how will we, the independent voter, nearly 70% of the USA-Voter-Population, know of the corruption in the carbon-trapping-businesses, but that we will be trusting the power companies and others, to monitor themselves for carbon-dioxide rising from smoke stacks as transparent as the sky behind….
2007-03-22
10:32:45
·
1 answers
·
asked by
mud-with-mind
1