I was arguing with someone over global warming and they said something about how "biological CO2" is absorbed by the plants and oceans. I was not aware that there was a distinction between "biological" and "artificial" CO2. I always thought CO2 was CO2, because it is always the same elemental composition. I'm aware that plants take in CO2 to make oxygen (this includes phytoplankton). Perhaps other gases are released into the air from burning fossil fuels, but as far as I'm concerned, CO2 is the main "culprit of global warming." I don't necessarily believe that CO2 levels in the atmosphere are the sole case, or even a significant accelerator, of global warming. However, I need to be able to provide a well researched counter argument against any of his claims and, well, any help counts.
2007-05-02
05:01:13
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous