Okay, I realize that the best way to prove something is to debunk what other people on the other side have said, so here goes:
Evolutionists say that if evolution isn't true, then what is the alternative? Did animals just appear? They ask that if you accept the fossil evidence, it shows that not all animals appeared at the same time. Dogs aren't as old as dinosaurs, for example. If evolution isn't true, then that means that dogs just kind of appeared.
Okay, here's my rebuttal. Stories don't prove ANYTHING. You can't disprove that animals didn't just appear. According to the mind of a foolish evolutionist, that automatically means that it probably isn't true. That is the biggest bunch of bull I've ever heard.
There is evidence for creationism. Just go to a creationist website and they prove that EVILution is not true.
I realize that evolution may seem to be more probable, but here's the problem with it:
How can the first life form from NOTHING?
2007-03-24
06:47:28
·
41 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous