Not looking for reactive responses, nor am I aiming to make people angry. I repect all points of view and this is just something I've been wondering about.
I'm asking this, because I was recently reading the definition of the scientific method in a science textbook, and part of this describes this method as "test with experiments". Since you can't test, or observe, cross-species evolution in an experiment, would that then make large-scale cross-species evolution only theory, and not science?
I understand that mutations and small-scale evolution can be observed (such as changes in fruit flies, moths, etc.) but the changes of one species into another can't be observed or recreated in experiments. Would this then render evolutionary as a theory unable to be verified by the scientific method?
Again, no reactive responses please. I'm just interested in learning.
Thanks.
2007-03-01
03:13:12
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Rob
5