I am going to write an essay about cloning, but being a very broad subject, I have narrowed it down to the cloning of animals. Some people say that cloning is wrong because there is no need to create more animals when there are so many homeless ones in the world. They also claim that clones tend to develop health complications, so why "create" life just for it to suffer? The other side holds to the belief that the amazing science of cloning can be used to save endangered (or even extinct) species. The animal will be cloned, and once there are enough, they will start breeding naturally. Some have even gone so far as to say they will bring back dinosaurs (hmmm...sounds familiar...Jurassic Park maybe?). As for the health problems, scientists have successfully cloned and kept alive many endangered African wild cats. The cats have even had kittens naturally, proving that they are healthy. It has been a while since Dolly was cloned, and cloning has been improved. So, what is your opinion?
2006-12-14
03:52:18
·
9 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous