Biology - August 2006

2006-08-10 11:37:11 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-08-10 11:05:59 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-08-10 11:03:03 · 14 answers · asked by ismael 1

2006-08-10 10:55:14 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

I don't know if Apes have them, but it seems as if there is no real practical application for them (maybe better grip?) but what is more weird about them is that no two are the same, it just seems real strange why evolution would do this.

2006-08-10 10:18:51 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

In simple terms Men are from Mokeys.Then why the rest of monkeys remained as monkeys?Why fishes remaned as fishes?Why birds did not become fishes?
How come man as the only exception to go through all these so called evolution?

2006-08-10 10:10:30 · 26 answers · asked by aneesh 1

2006-08-10 09:04:22 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-08-10 08:57:17 · 8 answers · asked by Cyber 6

Should we just ignore them, or should a more pro-active approach be taken (though I'm not sure what!)?

2006-08-10 08:55:55 · 8 answers · asked by the last ninja 6

2006-08-10 08:26:39 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-08-10 07:49:30 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

For example, many caucasions are called "white," but no caucasion thinks their skin actually looks white for real. Maybe peach, tan, or something. I am interested in what you actually perceive your skin color to be, especially among those who have a skin tone others sometimes label in English with a color. E.g., reddish for some northern Europeans, brown for some people, black for others.

My bet is that whatever color-label you are called, just as most caucasions called "white" would not actually perceive their skin as in any way white, "red" Irishman would in no way perceive their skin as reddish, "blacks" would in no way perceive their skin as actually black, and so on for "brown" and "yellow". In each case, each person perceives their color to be kind of hard to describe, just as a caucasion might struggle and say peach-ish.

Alternatively, perhaps some of you are, say, called "brown" by others in the racial or ethnic sense, and ALSO truly perceive yourself to be genuinely brown.

2006-08-10 07:24:29 · 5 answers · asked by A professor (thus usually wrong) 3

2006-08-10 05:50:23 · 12 answers · asked by linda 2

why is it easy?, what should i be aware of, and what should i expect. thank u

2006-08-10 05:46:54 · 9 answers · asked by ht0002008 1

2006-08-10 05:33:21 · 8 answers · asked by The Plumber 3

2. The complexity of structure and function varies widely across the animal kingdom. Despite this variation, animals exhibit common processes. These include the following.
. transport of materials
. response to stimuli
. gas exchange
. locomotion
(a) Choose two of the processes above and for each, describe the relevant structures and how they function to accomplish the process in the following phyla.
Cnidaria (e.g., hydra, jellyfish)
Annelida (e.g., earthworm)
Chordata (e.g., mouse)
(b) Explain the adaptive (evolutionary) value(s) of the structural examples you described in part a.

i dont get part b. What am i supposed to say?

2006-08-10 05:20:44 · 3 answers · asked by Beatled 1

I have this competition on "conserving bio diversity:prospects and concerns". We have been told to make six minute PPT presentations on this, they haven't given any sub titles, I really can't figure out what sub topics to include, the topic is really really vast, cud someone help in suggesting the sub topics

2006-08-10 05:03:15 · 2 answers · asked by The Alchemist 1

2006-08-10 04:51:07 · 36 answers · asked by Sy355 1

It is pretty small, and has a green head and thorax. It has a small stinger, I found them attracted to my kitchen light.

2006-08-10 04:21:12 · 4 answers · asked by alidansma 3

2006-08-10 04:17:12 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

even if they're using they're tongue by clicking it to detect things you think they have this 360 degrees eyesight? i called it eyesight bec. they say they can picture an object by producing echo to bounce to the object and bounce back to them. that's all i heard

2006-08-10 03:47:57 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

My biology textbook talks about Spontaneous Generation, and how people once believed that living things (like maggots or mice) came from garbage and dead meat (dead things). The book says this isn't possible and disproved it with an experiment.

But for Evolution to have worked, wouldn't the first single celled organisms have been a result of spontaneous generation? If not, what was it?

Thank in advance for clearing up my confusion.

2006-08-10 03:17:18 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-08-10 02:51:26 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-08-10 02:16:15 · 14 answers · asked by brendanconnal 1

wt it happen,, wt is its signal of coming,,wt we can use as its protection,,is tht affect on nebody,,

2006-08-10 02:03:23 · 3 answers · asked by shilpadtt 1

2006-08-10 01:54:31 · 15 answers · asked by Kevin G 2

WHAT IS ITS SIGNIFICANCE IN OUR LIFE

2006-08-10 01:19:20 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

I thought the log must be in the form of log(base)Value? This term, I always got it from medicine/biology paper that, they express the value as 3log10 (where 10 is the subscript). That is the log of base 10 without a value.
I always assume 3log10=1000. But don't know how to explain it.

By the way, I always see they wrote something like the blood contains 3log10 of substances., or 2.4-log10. etc

Thanks.

2006-08-10 01:13:38 · 4 answers · asked by wyeechen 2

2006-08-10 00:52:55 · 15 answers · asked by red leaf 1

2006-08-10 00:17:29 · 4 answers · asked by lori 1