What is the best way to deal with creationists vandalising questions on evolutionary biology?

Question

Should we just ignore them, or should a more pro-active approach be taken (though I'm not sure what!)?

Answer 1

I think that a pro-active stance is needed, simply to provide valid information to folks who might otherwise be deluded by their nonsense. One way of doing that is by supplying accurate, well-reasoned responses in this forum, and I have attempted to do so. It should be emphasized that there is nothing inherently wrong with creationism per se: the problem with it is that it is useless, as it can predict nothing. (There is a proof of this.)

Answer 2

I would opt for the proactive approach. But what should it look like? It won't help to tell them that they are wrong, simply because anyone told they are wrong will immediately become more defensive and you simply harden the fronts between you. First off, I would suggest that scientisits need to be able to explain clearly and in understandable terms their main ideas. Secondly, we need to listen, so that we can differentiate between fears (some well justified, others not) and bad science. Thirdly, we should learn philosophy, so we can understand the potentials and limits of our trait. Fourth, if you are dealing with creationism and biblical literalism it helps to have a good understanding of what the bible is about and how one interprets texts (i.e., we should know about hermeneutics). Only too often, scientists read the bible just a literally as their main opponent, biblical literalists. More than anything, we need to educate, seek conservation, be humble not to offend and drive people away, and let go off the arrogance that is only too often a typical trait of scientists.

I hope this helps.

Answer 3

Greetings;

The strategy really depends on the creationist. Some are merely ignorant of the research and evidence supporting evolution. In this case feel free to share with them the knowledge that you have, also direct them to other sources (books, journals, scientists). If you live near a university, suggest that they see if there are any public lectures being offered. Be polite, and open the door for them, but don't try and push them through.

If the person is a fundamentalist who relies solely on faith, just stop, you will be arguing apples and oranges. You can throw facts left and right and only serve to make them more hostile. Their belief is based on faith and no amount of fact will change that. I refer to this as "willfully ignorant". It's not worth the aggravation...believe me I've tried, and I'm working on a PhD in molecular biology.

Answer 4

Good question. Creationism in itself is an innocent belief. It become harmful when creationist ask their doctrine to be incorporated in the universities scientific programs or evolutionism barred from those programs.
But scientists are partly responsible for this qui pro quo when they presents metphysical view as if they were scientific ones. For instance, when they teach that mind was created by matter through an evolutionary process. One may beleve it, teach it as a methaphysical view, but not present it as a scientific one.
This kind of abuse makes creationnist furious, and they are right.

Answer 5

sure that should make plenty greater sense, provided that evolution is a controversy of biology, no longer theology. in spite of the incontrovertible fact that, some non secular communities have self-interpreted the Bible in techniques which make it seem to contradict organic fact as revealed via technological know-how. provided that they think approximately their own guesses with regards to the which technique of bible passages infallible, that leaves them interior the unsightly place of having for example that technological know-how is incorrect, in spite of the overpowering information in help of such clinical findings. No real fact can contradict the different real fact. provided that organic and organic evolution is obviously a fact, their own biblical interpretations are patently defective. yet they're going to combat enamel and nail to objective to steer away from that inescapable certainty. it incredibly is unhappy relatively, by way of fact many non secular Christians discover suited solidarity between biblical fact and clinical fact.

Answer 6

Ask them if they are comfortable criticizing God for choosing evolution as His method of creating the various species and if they consider it a sin for them to question His decisions.

Answer 7

Crucifixion...?

Answer 8

i hope we can get good answers regarding this and many of such types in this great site http://www.harunyahya.com/