Astronomy & Space - August 2006

Please give truthful and respectful answers only.

If so, where were you February 1st, 2003 when you heard the news?

How did you feel then?

How do you feel about NASA now?

Do you think the shuttle program is still worth the risk?

2006-08-21 12:34:09 · 6 answers · asked by Oklahoman 6

It's been a speculation for quite some time...now we seem to have more evidence that shows the first moon landing in 1969 could have indded been a hoax

2006-08-21 12:25:21 · 18 answers · asked by Beth D 2

pluto and chaorn orbits a point in space so if u say charon is the moon of pluto, then how about pluto is the moon of charon???

original defintion of planet is good and they only count up to 12 because later on , they will keep on adding more, so dont say original definition suck.

2006-08-21 12:09:30 · 9 answers · asked by JACKZACK 1

i encourage u to read the words of the proposal it say the IF THE BARYCENTRE OF THE MOON AND PLANET IS INSIDE THE MOON, IT IS A MOON, WHICH MEANS ALL THE MOONS IN THE SOLAR SYTEM WOULD STILL BE A MOON, except CHARON!

so dont tell me the original one is not good because the moons would all become planets then...they wont, read a little!

2006-08-21 12:02:23 · 3 answers · asked by JACKZACK 1

2006-08-21 11:40:56 · 14 answers · asked by buntnik d 1

I was told tonight that there is more than one star in OUR solar system bigger than the sun, can somebody prove or disprove this point to me please???

2006-08-21 11:39:07 · 11 answers · asked by Katie 4

What I was meaning was if planets are made by lots of particles from, space being attracted together- don't know if that's true at all- then how do lots of the same particles become attracted together to make the cores of planets different from each other rather than all of them attracting the same particles and being identical? Also, was there a time when there was nothing at all in space?If so then how did things suddenly come into being?

2006-08-21 11:07:29 · 9 answers · asked by hey_mcfly! 2

2006-08-21 10:22:56 · 12 answers · asked by Teddy 1

please!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2006-08-21 10:17:51 · 21 answers · asked by ashketchem1 2

Frogs and junk like that at there moon landings revealing there pupose was to honnor clones from toads?

2006-08-21 10:03:31 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

I think it was the second landing on the moon when one of the astonauts said there is a powerful light hitting the moon from earth. And then said it clip the landing craft clip off some of it big sparks or molten metal from the picture I seen and then said you down there on earth Im going to get you for this he said it on the radio transmisission.

2006-08-21 09:58:49 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

If roaches and insects can survive for a long time without air, why don;'t we realease some bugs into space and see if they evolve or how about one of our astruanuts realse AIDS or HIV bacteria or any bacteria in space and see if it evolves into something.

2006-08-21 09:33:47 · 23 answers · asked by stewart_pittman 2

I am very new to telescopes. I just bought a telescope, and everything that I look at on land is upsidedown. When I want to look at somehing here on earth, How do I get the picture rightside up?

2006-08-21 09:19:51 · 7 answers · asked by Green 2

For example: There is such thing as the flat earth society...

2006-08-21 09:17:37 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

Tell me your "Proof"

(This is not as simple a question as you may think)

2006-08-21 09:09:48 · 12 answers · asked by justaskn 4

in the simplest leymans terms you can like you are telling a child!!

2006-08-21 09:02:29 · 8 answers · asked by Ivan R Don 4

The Bible Thumpers who insist on invading every discussion on the origins of the universe here are basically proposing Genesis as an alternate theory of the beginning of time. I realize that we probably aren't going to be changing anyone's mind, but can't we scientifically PROVE that at least some of Genesis is inaccurate? Please cite your sources and be objective. We're representing science here.

Clearly, if even PART of it is inaccurate, then a literal interpretation of Genesis becomes impossible to trust.

I think would be a very interesting topic of discussion. Welcome, Genesis, to the Scientific Method.

2006-08-21 08:51:32 · 14 answers · asked by cailano 6

2006-08-21 08:27:57 · 30 answers · asked by FreeSpirit 1

and there is no oxygen in space, then how does the sun stay burning?

2006-08-21 08:17:32 · 4 answers · asked by jssckly 1

2006-08-21 07:49:24 · 20 answers · asked by samo 1

i heard some other chap called ilushin or something like that went 1st but badly injured himself on return to earth.'Back in the day' it was all about beating the usa.

2006-08-21 07:05:44 · 11 answers · asked by Ivan R Don 4

plz and a link it's for a science exit project

2006-08-21 06:53:50 · 48 answers · asked by jivelikedat 2

if suppose in the near or distant future mankind encounters an alien life form which is far more superior than humans and which has completely different beliefs and far more superior knowledge regarding existance of life form than any beliefs or knowlegde of humans will it change our concept of life itself and our existance

2006-08-21 06:52:47 · 11 answers · asked by sCrUbs 3

How big a circle would represent a distance of the nearest star about 4.5 light years. How big would planet earth be on the same scale

2006-08-21 06:03:23 · 7 answers · asked by bwadsp 5

2006-08-21 05:45:38 · 22 answers · asked by Naina 1

2006-08-21 05:37:28 · 13 answers · asked by First Littleleo 2

i see on tv that they always joke about him by telling that he drinks alot of tang orange juice...so what is this joke based on??

2006-08-21 05:13:24 · 0 answers · asked by whatever 3

2006-08-21 03:59:10 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

fully about sunset

2006-08-21 02:51:50 · 22 answers · asked by gokul p 1

fully about sunset

2006-08-21 02:42:17 · 7 answers · asked by gokul p 1