English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Science & Mathematics - 7 July 2006

[Selected]: All categories Science & Mathematics

Agriculture · Alternative · Astronomy & Space · Biology · Botany · Chemistry · Earth Sciences & Geology · Engineering · Geography · Mathematics · Medicine · Other - Science · Physics · Weather · Zoology

What purpose would this particular combination of elements be used for in any human endeavor?

2006-07-07 01:57:09 · 2 answers · asked by ann_i_am2005 1 in Chemistry

or specify some book or link. pls

2006-07-07 01:48:06 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Engineering

huh? what u think?

2006-07-07 01:46:44 · 8 answers · asked by hacker_d26i 2 in Other - Science

Those bones are dino seeds and I wish you those archaeologists would stop digging them up. Ya see, it takes about 500 degrees Fahrenheit to get those bones to germinate and sprout and then grow into an everloving dinosaur... Whats supposed to happen is you guys keeps polluting the planet and through global warming you raise temps up to around 500F STOP digging those dino seeds up!

2006-07-07 01:43:40 · 9 answers · asked by johncharlesrealty 2 in Earth Sciences & Geology

2006-07-07 01:39:50 · 5 answers · asked by ehem18 1 in Biology

This is just a radical theory I came up with. I'd like to hear a physicist's thought.

What if EVERYTHING in the universe is composed of one single atom, moving at a constant rate - the speed of light - to create everything that exists?
Think of pixels on your television - each one is lit starting from the top left corner, and moving in sequence to fill the screen. This composes one frame. Many frames per second make up the moving image we see.
What if life worked in the same manner and that one atom was composing everything? This would explain where all the "mass" in the universe came from. The smallest fraction of time may actually take an enormous amount of time to compose, but in our frame of reference, it moves seamlessly and at a constant rate.
The theory of relativity suggests non-simultaneousness and time dilation, both which would play major parts in supporting this theory.

It seems impossible, but the laws of Physics do not care if the human brain can comprehend them.

2006-07-07 01:38:16 · 11 answers · asked by clone1973 5 in Physics

2006-07-07 01:29:42 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Physics

2006-07-07 01:22:09 · 10 answers · asked by brian_the_lion2000 3 in Medicine

2006-07-07 01:18:49 · 18 answers · asked by CrualKing 1 in Geography

his shadow. How high above the ground is the light bulb?If the person's head is exactly 5ft. from the light bulb, how far is the person from the pole, and how long is the shadow?

2006-07-07 01:16:46 · 3 answers · asked by marjorie_062001 2 in Mathematics

I am using ray box and with red filter and the light reflected on a yellow object. A red light is reflected..Why ?

2006-07-07 01:13:44 · 5 answers · asked by Phebe 2 in Other - Science

2006-07-07 01:05:53 · 10 answers · asked by madhu1187 1 in Engineering

2006-07-07 00:59:08 · 6 answers · asked by roseanne_cute 1 in Other - Science

2006-07-07 00:55:41 · 17 answers · asked by hacker_d26i 2 in Earth Sciences & Geology

We do new work for MPhil and PhD which is not done yet. Then why we called it "Re Search Work"?

2006-07-07 00:48:55 · 6 answers · asked by seema 1 in Mathematics

If Hubble captures light that is 13 bn years old and the universe is approximately 14 bn years old, how come we can see it?

Wouldn't the universe be a maximum of 1 billion light years across when this light was created and it therefore would have gone past us 12 bn years ago? I thought that the speed of light is an absolute limit, so to repeat the obvious it would have been produced when the universe was 1bn years old, but 13 bn light years across (mimimum).

Please answer ASAP as I need to sleep.


Thanks.

PS No maths please.

2006-07-07 00:40:33 · 18 answers · asked by curious George 2 in Astronomy & Space

I've looked in photoshop, but I don't know how 'radius' relates to cycles per image or cycles per number of pixels. I need two different spatial frequency bands, one band <6 cycles per image, and one band > 24 cycles per image. Cheers!

2006-07-07 00:38:22 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Science

give a good answer.

2006-07-07 00:32:57 · 3 answers · asked by illias k 2 in Physics

2006-07-07 00:32:43 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Geography

2006-07-07 00:26:33 · 12 answers · asked by OicedvenomO 2 in Astronomy & Space

2006-07-07 00:23:47 · 9 answers · asked by arvind g 1 in Biology

2006-07-07 00:22:22 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Biology

2006-07-07 00:20:37 · 10 answers · asked by r3_ajay 1 in Geography

2006-07-07 00:15:02 · 10 answers · asked by skoolgirl 1 in Chemistry

fedest.com, questions and answers