English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Other - Politics & Government - December 2007

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

Listen here, jacknuts, you think if everyone was gun wielding no one would get hurt? u think it's the OK corral with bullets and lead whizzing by everywhere? more people would have been killed by civilians' stray bullets than by the perpetrators assault rifle.

2007-12-09 05:33:15 · 10 answers · asked by 8lboreck 1

RonPaul2008.com

2007-12-09 05:26:41 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

guns just kill people...u say why cant i defend myself from criminals..well how about u try actually talking to them instead of acting more aggressively which will make them angry in turn
the second amendment says a militia is legal not u owning guns..ever see the michael moore movie? it speaks truth.."does arms mean i am allowed a nuclear weapon"?

2007-12-09 05:21:09 · 31 answers · asked by 8lboreck 1

Why has the last attempt on his life when Clinton was in power?

I am tired of seeing videos of him basically mocking you.

2007-12-09 04:50:45 · 14 answers · asked by Edge Caliber 6

Should the same gun control laws that govern the people of say... rural Montana also govern the streets of Chicago? Would you take away the right of a rancher to carry a sidearm or rifle? How about those of us who depend on wild game for food? How about those of us who live an hour away from the nearest police officer? Would you take away those guns as well?

2007-12-09 03:07:17 · 10 answers · asked by speed__phreak 2

But all other aspects of life are things that government should control?

2007-12-09 02:20:56 · 10 answers · asked by spicymnguy 5

I live in Colombia, and my cable company has decided to discontinue Fox News Channel. Fox has been replaced by a comedy channel. (Apparently only about 150 people watch Fox here on a regular basis)

(My blood pressure has stabilised lately, I have to add, but I miss the comedy value)
Should I be disappointed or happy?

2007-12-09 02:07:09 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

Heck maybe ever. Walter Cronkite was always most trusted but I mean come on, these days he is almost a socialist.

2007-12-09 01:58:39 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

are we going to have ANOTHER governor go to prison?

2007-12-09 01:38:27 · 2 answers · asked by daddio 7

2007-12-09 00:01:29 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-08 23:48:16 · 11 answers · asked by April 5

Please go here to give a few of my songs a listen...

www.myspace.com/compasscharlatan


I know I cant sing and I recorded these in my basement so the quality is poor, but can you give me advice on what you like or hate.

Is the music good?
Are the lyrics good?
Am I too preachy or political?

How can i improve my vocals- (which I know suck)?

Any other comments - positive or negative - are greatly appreciated....

Thank u all....

2007-12-08 23:31:55 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

As some of you are aware, I like to answer questions about the BNP. Specifically, the fact that if they took power, that they would limit our rights to vote.

I even posted a link http://www.bnp.org.uk/candidates2005/manifesto/manf16.htm Strangely, after doing so on questions asked by a BNP member who is trying to become a councillor, the link location has been removed on the BNP website.

Do you think that it is a strange coincidence, or do you think that the BNP do not want us, the UK electorate to know the truth of what kind of Britain they would inflict upon us if they took power?

You can download the manifesto which states this here http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/vote_2005/frontpage/4476279.stm still.

2007-12-08 23:29:34 · 17 answers · asked by The Patriot 7

http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2007/ga10612.doc.htm

The native people have been massacered in thier millions since the first nazi set foot on it's soil, and even now The same nazis are denying the rights to native people at the U.N since it was formed.So what right hve the barbarians got to tell other countires about thier mistreatment of thier people when the nazi barbarians are them selves not only mistreating but oppresiing an entire native people race?

2007-12-08 22:23:53 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Guantamino bay, Vietnam mass rape and napalm bombing, CIA torture interrogation all over the globe, ILLEGAL invasion of Iraq for its oil and lack of finding WMDs. YET the US thinks it credibly can persuade China to losen up its media for human rights issues! Hilarious dont you think?

2007-12-08 21:21:34 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

since the president's wife is "first lady" whats a president's husband called?

2007-12-08 19:04:41 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

Lets just say for now -

Iran has a nuclear missle - several

No one is stupid enough to believe that there would be no retaliation for useing such a weapon

Not even the Iran doesn't have any homosexuals President "Im a dinner jacket" could believe that if he launched one 10 wouldn't come back on him

So this appears the crux -

In order for a nuclear weapons arsenal - to be really dangerous in the hands of the Iranian Aylatolah - (The President is not as powerful as one is lead to believe )

We have to accept that Iran is suicidal

That they would launch knowing it equals death for all - ALL of them -

So - are they - Are they that anxious to die in a fire ball of retaliation ?

2007-12-08 18:47:44 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-08 17:47:13 · 4 answers · asked by Anita 5

2007-12-08 17:06:30 · 21 answers · asked by Reflected Life 5

and im not talking spying on the opposition, just the regular people.

2007-12-08 16:51:45 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

How else can we explain his tremendous success when it comes to the horrifically liberal media downplaying certain characteristics of Bush while it never failed to point out similar "faults" while Clinton was (running for) president. For example:

1) Clinton was ridiculed as a "Bubba" and "Billy Boy" the hick, while Bush's "southern" background was portrayed by the liberal media as being modestly charming and down home. How else do you explain Bush's winning over of the media other than his ingenius ability to charm and manipulate even his enemies? (Because the goverment and media being in cahoots with each other would sure be a nutty conspiracy theory).

2) Bush's use of marijuana, coke, and alchohol comsumption is barely mentioned by the media (unless it's comedy shows), while Clinton faced non-stop ridiculed that he "never inhaled" when he was younger.

2007-12-08 16:43:18 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-08 14:29:08 · 7 answers · asked by Jack S 3

When will the apokespeople fort hese groups clarify their psoition on this matter that concerns ll Americans, such as the Family Research council which is leading the charge against hate crime legislation.

2007-12-08 14:21:02 · 8 answers · asked by sSuper critic 2

There are ten steps that fascist dictators take to gradually shift a democracy into a fascist regime, is there US almost there?
Here are the steps:
1. Invoke an external and internal threat. -Global War on Terror.
2. Establish Secret Prisons. - Abu Gharib
3. Develop a paramilitary force.- Blackwater
4. Surveil Ordinairy citizens. -Illegal warrantless wiretapping, opening private citizens email and mail.
5. Infiltrate citizens groups. - Anti-war groups have been infilitrated by undercover police, etc.
6. Arbitrarily detain and release citizens.
7. Target Key individuals. -Valerie Plame, Michael Moore, Dixie Chicks.
8. Restrict the press. -See: Lead up to Iraq War.
9. Cast Criticism as "espionage" and dissent as "treason." -Two words, ONE witch: Ann Coulter.
10. Subvert the rule of law. -Bush's EXCESSIVE use of "signing statements" which allow him to sign legislation into law, but HE decides which laws are enforced and which aren't.

Thoughts?

2007-12-08 13:14:38 · 14 answers · asked by It's Your World, Change It 6

fedest.com, questions and answers