Other - Politics & Government - February 2007

When you conform to this structure, your saying i prefer someone unknown to me having rule & control over me & my family! Explain that logic? Smart people don't want that. They want control, choice of rule & give respect & oppurtunity to their fellow legal citizens! Legal citizen majority rule & control will serve the most the best verses the current wealthy few minority! Please No wait til voting comments Democracy in USA has to come with Proof!

2007-02-03 07:26:23 · 7 answers · asked by bulabate 6

2007-02-03 07:23:56 · 7 answers · asked by omar v 1

2007-02-03 07:09:48 · 18 answers · asked by JAMES 4

Yahoo answers is using Indian government officials to use Yahoo answers and advertising about it in websites to make its product a success.
Is it ethical for an Indian President to take part in campaigns like this? Will Abdul Kalam take part in SMS contest by HUTCH AIRTEL or Reliance Communication in future asking how can we make India a better place in 2020 ??? Are these type of campaings ethical?

2007-02-03 06:45:06 · 14 answers · asked by pinkfreud(aruninte.blogspot.com) 3

If a person belongs to an organization that advocates, supports, or participates in acts of terrorism with the objective of destabilizing a democratic government, supporting a foreign power or forcing religious conversion, should that person retain citizen or residency rights in a Western democracy? Antartica is not owned by any state so it could become a home for stateless people if no other country will take them. There are precedents in which Nazis have been stripped of citizenship.

2007-02-03 06:31:13 · 9 answers · asked by d/dx+d/dy+d/dz 6

2007-02-03 06:21:29 · 19 answers · asked by A True Gentleman 5

Besides global warming the one thing that all liberals agree with is that the world hates America. They keep talking about improving America's *image*. Even Hillary Clinton wants to restore America's image with the world. If liberals loved America so much, wouldn't they be more concerned about improving AMERICA and let it's image take care of itself? More importantly, what does this obsession with image say about liberals?

2007-02-03 06:06:50 · 19 answers · asked by cornbread 4

sure hope so

2007-02-03 06:03:35 · 21 answers · asked by Arwen73 3

It seems to me that Scotland is largely overlooked. When people think of the UK or Britain they usually think of just England and Wales. Scotland has a rich and independent history, customs and languages (including scots and gaelic). Do you think it would benefit from being it's own independent country?

2007-02-03 05:53:07 · 13 answers · asked by Kaela 4

That's what happens when you raise the minimum wage... those worth less than the minimum wage get canned. Why do libs want to see so many Americans lose their jobs?

2007-02-03 05:16:13 · 17 answers · asked by x 4

2007-02-03 04:32:56 · 16 answers · asked by Sue b 1

If a citizen is on welfare and not contributing anything to society, should they be allowed to participate in the democratic process? Should voting be a reward for the people that actually do the right things and work hard/stay out of jail? Or would this be unfair to the democrats?

2007-02-03 04:09:13 · 13 answers · asked by Matt 4

To calculate the price that Iraqis have paid for the American misadventure in their country, you have to deal in big, round, horrifying numbers. Civilians killed last year: 34,000. Driven from their homes within Iraq: 1.8 million. Fled to other countries: an additional 2 million, and growing. The number of Iraqis who have found refuge in the United States is easier to pin down. This country has admitted a grand total of 466 Iraqi refugees since 2003.

However President Bush tries to manage the endgame of his dismal war, America has an obligation to the Iraqis whose lives it has upended. It owes a particular debt to those who have face

2007-02-03 03:56:01 · 10 answers · asked by Paul I 4

Do you vote for a party or a person? Will you vote a straight republican or straight democratic ticket; or will you vary based on each individual candidate's opinions/past/stances?

2007-02-03 03:43:48 · 7 answers · asked by Jax 4

2007-02-03 03:23:02 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-02-03 03:12:54 · 18 answers · asked by chetahbill 4

2007-02-03 03:12:51 · 14 answers · asked by Bob M 1

2007-02-03 03:04:51 · 3 answers · asked by Heroic Gesture 2

Representative government puts to much power & trust in the very few who consistantly fall to the corruption of being paid off no matter who steps up to the plate! We need to amend the constitution giving ultimate power to the legal majority! Lets try a vote here now! All those in favor of shuting the door on all immigration vote yes those opposed vote no. My vote is YES!

2007-02-03 02:46:09 · 12 answers · asked by bulabate 6

Many americans actually think they are the "good guys" and actually believe victory will be achieved in IRAQ.

All americans have done from DAY #1 is destabilize the entire region , making it far more dangerous than ever.

Saddam kept the Iranians, Al Queda and many terrorist groups OUT of IRAQ. Now they have a new playground in IRAQ and free american TARGETS because of George Bush.

George Bush and his cronies have far more blood on their hands than most can imagine...because they are ignorant.

The Bush Regime has hurt the USA far more than AlQueda ever dreamed. Osama's bold Gambit of 9/11/01 drew the Bush Regime into a checkmate in IRAQ.

The game is over...the USA lost the day they attacked IRAQ.

Now the only question left is how long it is going to take for the fools in Washington DC to admit they lost and go from there.

2007-02-03 02:38:23 · 13 answers · asked by liverlips 1

Our government officials and their families never got involved with people like Saddam and Ossama in the past. I mean because Bush and Rumsfeld Used to be friends with them. Do you think if we never got involved with them in the first place they would have done with they did?

2007-02-03 02:14:58 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

I can't escape the fact that the direction we are heading in is one of a massively polarised society in which there are some people (and with globalisation, nations) who have financial control over material wealth, & others who do the work & yet have no control. Massively disparate levels of relative wealth in societies that call themselves committed to equality & freedom causes discontent as the gulf between principle & reality deepens. Looking at the prevalence of cheap (& in some cases free) labour for the health of global capitalism, to which there has been no challenge since the collapse of the Soviet Union, should we just have masters and unwaged slaves & simply encourage the masters to treat the slaves well and look after them? Should we, in other words, embrace the feudal society fully, as this is what we have in effect already but the disparity between the liberal ideal & the reality causes discontent rather than people simply knowing their place? What is the alternative?

2007-02-03 02:13:41 · 20 answers · asked by RonanJ 1

Best answer gets posted on my website:

http://www.therealamericantruth.com

2007-02-03 02:05:58 · 16 answers · asked by Buffman316 1

Can u pay money for ur record 2 b deleted? if so, how much?

2007-02-03 02:05:18 · 2 answers · asked by krispiemeow 3

Al didn't invent the internet, nor does Hillary own Exxon/Mobil, but she sure talks like she does....telling us what she's going to do with their profits when she's prez..... I'd tell you my true impressions of Hillary...but I wouln't want to offend caninedom.

2007-02-03 01:42:04 · 8 answers · asked by aBranch@60-WA ,<>< 4

do you hate us or love us.... why?

2007-02-03 01:14:00 · 13 answers · asked by your wonderwall 5

2007-02-03 01:12:47 · 21 answers · asked by madison31 1

I do not beleive in Slavery, nor do I beleive in hating anyone because of the color of their skin, religion or country of origin.

It was during a recent discussion on the causes of world war I that the thought occurred to me that it was the harsh treatment of the south following the civil war, not the down fall of the institution of slavery that has caused most of the racial hatred in this country today.

Abraham Lincoln accepted Lee's surrender with the words "With charity towards all and Malice towards none" for this he was shot!
Andrew Johnson attempted to hold to Lincoln's policy and for this he was impeached. (He was not removed from office)

Had Lincoln's postwar policy been adopted do you think many of attitudes of racial hatred in this country might have been avoided?

2007-02-03 00:36:34 · 7 answers · asked by pretender59321 6

Bearing in mind the lessons learnt from the Berlin Wall - segregation vs integration, how does building a huge wall with American taxpayers' money solve the Palestinian Problem?

2007-02-03 00:26:10 · 10 answers · asked by Dogstarrr 4

getting wormer and wormer? Do you notice changes? In my country sun shanes every day even though it is winter. We don't have snow and it is warm. We also have heavy storms, which we are not used to. I strongy believe the results of scientist researcers and I also question to bring child to that kind of world. I don't want my child suffer the consequences of our acts.

2007-02-02 23:56:55 · 9 answers · asked by Nelli 2