English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Homework Help - June 2006

[Selected]: All categories Education & Reference Homework Help

2006-06-06 06:15:56 · 8 answers · asked by ghs_spirit101 1

Hi,
I'm 14.. and we're doing Sex Education at school.
basically we have to make a leaflet about sex education for a (fake) school that doesn't have lessons.. and we can go it on anything.. I chose to do it on sex.. and precautions and stuff.. could you just write a bit about it and give some websites where I can get *not discusting** pictures for the leaflet.

2006-06-06 06:11:40 · 12 answers · asked by noname. 2

I am doing a reserach paper and I need to create 3 brief outlines experimenting with different orders. Any ideas???

2006-06-06 05:46:25 · 2 answers · asked by cutiepie23 1

the importance of literature in general. enumeration of its major importance

2006-06-06 05:26:16 · 3 answers · asked by laila 1

2006-06-06 05:11:48 · 6 answers · asked by vicky24 1

please help me for the electution

2006-06-06 04:29:41 · 5 answers · asked by kyanam sunny 1

i'm a 11 year old boy and my exams are on 16 june and without watching TV how can i improve my language skills?????thanks alot

2006-06-06 04:00:24 · 31 answers · asked by karrottu 2

2006-06-06 03:54:52 · 7 answers · asked by rndyfindley 3

This afternoon I have to give a presentatipn about a website, which I created about myself and my first year of highschool. The website talks about the following aspects:

Academics
Technology - (using a computer)
Cocoricular
My Movie - (I made a movie)

In the presentation, I speak for 6-7 minutes about these aspects, and how they affected my grade nine life at school.

I am being marked on an introduction and Conclusion to the speech. So i need help coming up with something interesting, unique, and cathcy - I would appreciate ANY ideas at all.

Thanks,
Dave

2006-06-06 03:20:00 · 1 answers · asked by daverwoodward 1

ok..guys here is another question..and Need for school...

2006-06-06 03:11:20 · 9 answers · asked by Chelsea 1

Please answer, my exams are near!!!

2006-06-06 03:06:18 · 6 answers · asked by sweet_cub 2

2006-06-06 02:56:58 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-06-06 02:47:37 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

i need help on how to be a good secretary.

2006-06-06 02:28:59 · 29 answers · asked by jumanji 1

how could i explain " thin to average sized " ?

2006-06-06 02:26:50 · 4 answers · asked by Nobody 1

OK..I really need this answer. It is an anatomy question and I need it for school.

2006-06-06 01:51:49 · 6 answers · asked by Chelsea 1

2006-06-06 01:11:47 · 32 answers · asked by sundeep 9732 1

5 cont.
In regards to Michael Jackson, the similarities that I see in both the book and in the Michael Jackson’s interview was that both Michael and Mr. McDonald were Naïve about their relationships with their reporters.
The Michael Jackson’s interview with Martin Bashir clearly demonstrates the gullibility of Mr. McDonald. The interview gave Mr. Bashir a great opportunity to show the world what Michael Jackson is really about. Mr. Bashir, who spent eight months with the singer, made up the program of a broad series of interview. The most disturbing outcome of the documentary was Martin bashir’s conduct--it was unprofessional and appalling. Although the reporter saw how Michael lived, in the interview he twisted and spins his words and the way of life. From the outset, bashir’s patronizing, overtly disapproving tone made the star cry. Mr. Bashir molded Michael into what can sell paper, not the gifted man that made one of the biggest impacts in music today.

2006-06-06 00:32:44 · 2 answers · asked by Nadege p 1

5.

When reading The Journalist and the Murder, two things crossed my mind: the Laci Peterson story and the Michael Jackson interview with Martin Bashir. The story is somewhat similar to Laci’s story because in the book, we learn that in 1979, a respected army physician named Dr. Jeffery McDonald claimed that four strangers broke into his home and killed his wife and two daughters. Although an army tribunal tried Dr McDonald and cleared him, years later the case was reopened. This time, McDonald was convicted and sentenced to prison, where he is still is today. Similarly, Laci Peterson a 27-year-old wife who was eight-month pregnant, disappeared on Christmas Eve. Four-months later after her body and her unborn child were discovered, people started to suspect the husband to be the killer; however, because there was no real evidence proving him guilty the charges against him were dropped. Nevertheless, after some time, people started noticing that Mr. Peterson’s story was not matching up so the case was reopened. The jury found Mr. Peterson guilty, charging him with two counts of murder. Now, just like Mr. McDonald, he is currently serving life in prison and perhaps the death penalty

2006-06-06 00:28:43 · 3 answers · asked by Nadege p 1

4.
There are great dangers that come when a person let his/her guard down and befriends a reporter because reporters are in the power to write whatever makes a good story in order to sell paper. The one mistake people make and still never learn from is to think before they speak especially when a reporter is writing about them.

2006-06-06 00:18:45 · 2 answers · asked by lala_jonesy 2

2
The first priority of a journalist is to increase sales along with the rating of the publication for which they work. They will use fact/opinion/rumor or "unnamed sources" to that end. Although it is ethically right for journalist to always write the truth, in reality this seldom happens in journalism. This is because; journalists cannot completely be objective about anything they investigate. Firstly, journalists are people and people tends to be biased no matter what code they are under, and second, journalists tend to quote people out of context. Reporters have the power to write whatever they want whether the story is true or not. They tend to twist interviewees words around to fabricate more interesting stories.

2006-06-06 00:12:11 · 1 answers · asked by lala_jonesy 2

1
The Journalist and the Murder

Do reporters purposely bring upon themselves the negative opinions many people hold or are they simply doing their jobs and are wrongly misjudged? Many people including me have frequently questioned the credibility and ethics of journalists.
Although, the ethics of Journalism are designed to help their readers to trust them it does not. As a matter a fact, journalists have the reputation of being conniving. It seems that they will go to whatever length or do whatever it takes to get their story--even speak to whomever will talk or go as far as gaining the trust of their subject and later on betraying that trust without any remorse.

2006-06-06 00:10:10 · 1 answers · asked by lala_jonesy 2

last
When scrutinizing all of the three articles, it is fair to say that the most influential reputation of the New York times have been destroyed because their credibility are now in question along with the reputations their reporters.

2006-06-06 00:05:54 · 4 answers · asked by lala_jonesy 2

4
they were destroyed as precursors with dual, civilian uses. She also alleged that Iraq had provided WMD aid to Syria and Al Qaeda. Therefore, as a result, this led Mrs. Judith Miller to be incarcerated for refusing to name a source in a grand jury investigation.
Many journalist might reasoned the motive behind Judith Miller’s silence was because of the code of ethics she along with other journalists hold to their subjects, which is confidentiality.
In the New York Times article, The Times and Iraq focusess hunger The New York Times reporters have when it comes to getting their stories, that they fail to use trustworthy sources. The people, who provided the information, were prejudiced against the Iraqi government that they gave false information, and in turn, these reporters write them as fact.

2006-06-06 00:03:38 · 3 answers · asked by lala_jonesy 2

Judith Miller, a prominent journalist had great access to top U.S. government officials. The Judith Miller case focuses primarily on how the reporter deliberately used unnamed sources in her Weapon Mass Destruction (WMD) article. She quoted unnamed "American officials" and "American intelligence experts" who said the tubes were intended to be used to enrich nuclear material, and cited unnamed "Bush administration officials" who claimed that in recent months, Iraq had "stepped up its quest for nuclear weapons and has embarked on a worldwide hunt for materials to make an atomic bomb." Also, that “ Mr. Hussein's dogged insistence on pursuing his nuclear ambitions, along with what defectors described in interviews as Iraq's push to improve and expand Baghdad's chemical and biological arsenals, have brought Iraq and the United States to the brink of war." Miller concluded that the main reason the United State forces had failed to find the Weapons of Mass Destruction was because they were

2006-06-06 00:00:57 · 3 answers · asked by lala_jonesy 2

Jason Blair, Judith Miller and The Times and Iraq, although focusing on very different aspects, no doubt they all share the same theme, which is misleading their readers with false information as well as the scandals in journalism. In addition, all three articles centers around the New York Times and some involved are writers for the New York Times.

In the Jayson Blair article, it explains the disgrace that one of the most prestigious newspapers in America, the New York Times, faced because, of Jayson Blair careless actions. The twenty-seven year old reporter, who never even graduated from college, succeeded in misleading colleagues, editors and most devastatingly, readers for years. The Times, in hopes to repair the damage done by a reporter who lacked ethics and morals, “asked readers to report any additional falsehoods in Blair’s work to an email address.”

2006-06-05 23:55:41 · 3 answers · asked by lala_jonesy 2

2006-06-05 23:48:57 · 3 answers · asked by Diane T 2

2006-06-05 23:07:20 · 11 answers · asked by adityaagarw 1

fedest.com, questions and answers