Anyone else think the ban is a little harsh? The argument that it's being banned to protect the smokers is a fallacy at the most. Nobody starts smoking for their health; no means to insult smokers, but if they start, they've made the subconscious decision that their health isn't worth a couple of dollars wasted on cancer sticks. I am quite passionate about the issue of smoking, but still, what is a ban gonna do? It should be the smokers choice that their health is more important than the cigarettes, not government.
2006-12-05
00:39:21
·
9 answers
·
asked by
Huey Freeman
5
in
Law & Ethics