We can only explain something using a scientific theroy that we already know. Science is what we (already) know. How about occurences that no one is (yet) educated enough to explain scientifically? My point is that out of all the things and phenomena in this universe, science can only explain to a certain extent. For example, it cannot scientifically explain life after death, astrological predictions or horoscopes, vodoo & occult, spirits & ghosts and the like. Just because we are not educated to explain it by a theory that scientists already know, are we justified in rejecting such theories or occurrences? What about things that cannot be explained by science, but that do really exist? Such unexplained things/para-normal activity in the world/universe remind us we have a lot more to learn, right?
2006-10-19
12:38:29
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Calculus
5