English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Other - Science - September 2006

[Selected]: All categories Science & Mathematics Other - Science

2006-09-15 02:23:51 · 5 answers · asked by parasolx 1

1

can you explain more about that?

2006-09-15 01:58:18 · 3 answers · asked by dandelion 2

2006-09-15 01:53:39 · 7 answers · asked by John 1

i have to work on an assignment about love. what are the chemical reaction that occurs when you fall in love? What are the best treatment when mental depression occurs in bad love?

2006-09-15 01:51:12 · 5 answers · asked by dandelion 2

can someone explain to me what western scientific paradigm is? what are the pros and cons??

2006-09-15 01:50:00 · 1 answers · asked by rache0116 3

Plz be specific and concise do not produce from books, websites.

2006-09-15 01:06:29 · 10 answers · asked by Master 4

The Paranormal isn't insane if you look at some of the theories phycists have put about the universe and that just because we don't understand what or why something happened doesn't mean it did'nt.

2006-09-15 00:19:36 · 12 answers · asked by anon4112 3

2006-09-14 23:28:53 · 9 answers · asked by John 1

2006-09-14 23:27:37 · 15 answers · asked by - 3

2006-09-14 21:57:49 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-14 21:46:04 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Fingerprints of the Gods, by Graeme Hancock, is a fantastic book detailing the probability of an advanced civilization 13,000 years ago, before a cataclysm wiped them out. Traces are found in our "ancient" civilizations such as the aztecs, who have determined when the next cataclysm will destroy our civilization. I'm not going to mention the date, but it's within the next decade, and if you've read the book you'll know what i'm talking about.

Please can someone reassure me that it's not true, that it's all just probability gained from making educated guesses about our ancesters and not based on fact?

And is there a book out there that totally proves Hancock was jumping to conclusions??

2006-09-14 21:43:49 · 7 answers · asked by ~ Cat ~ 2

2006-09-14 21:32:36 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

I dont have her phone number and she has breaked the friendship but still I am missing her. Ok i only want her to convey that I am sorry and will she be able to get that feeling thru telepathy ???

2006-09-14 21:27:09 · 8 answers · asked by little_mad_venus 2

2006-09-14 21:07:23 · 10 answers · asked by gil m 1

im not really sure what came first and it really annoys me not knowing

2006-09-14 21:06:10 · 34 answers · asked by danielleveale 1

The criterions to distinguish things from one another are same as the criterions by which "self" is distinguished from "non-self". Things cannot be distinguished from one another by the criterions with which self cannot be distinguished from non-self.

2006-09-14 20:29:29 · 5 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1

The criterions to distinguish things from one another are same as the criterions by which "self" is distinguished from "non-self". Things cannot be distinguished from one another by the criterions with which self cannot be distinguished from non-self.

2006-09-14 20:24:19 · 6 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1

2006-09-14 20:02:01 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-14 19:53:58 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-14 19:43:51 · 10 answers · asked by hyperthreadinguy 2

Is it gifferent to the UK and if so why?

2006-09-14 19:41:24 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-14 19:25:33 · 4 answers · asked by ben287392 1

2006-09-14 19:09:43 · 3 answers · asked by nkthanhtung 1

If you were abducted on a weird looking spaceship and you were asked to do something very dumb (dumb actually meant somthing funny in their lang) what would it be?

2006-09-14 18:13:46 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-14 18:13:21 · 2 answers · asked by JAMES 4

fedest.com, questions and answers