Earth Sciences & Geology - October 2006

2006-10-09 10:25:40 · 5 answers · asked by unknown 1

2006-10-09 10:22:46 · 3 answers · asked by unknown 1

2006-10-09 10:14:44 · 4 answers · asked by free7mountaineagle 1

2006-10-09 09:58:56 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Its all about roots, stems and leaves

2006-10-09 09:55:39 · 5 answers · asked by pogumgbuaja 1

2006-10-09 09:22:59 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-09 08:48:29 · 2 answers · asked by The word Fan! 1

2006-10-09 08:47:11 · 2 answers · asked by The word Fan! 1

2006-10-09 08:35:58 · 9 answers · asked by shoom 1

2006-10-09 08:19:07 · 2 answers · asked by awantwin2004 2

i would like to know how you mine the mineral quarts.

2006-10-09 07:40:44 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-09 07:01:21 · 3 answers · asked by Normandy 1

According to a creationist view

2006-10-09 07:01:09 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-09 06:25:53 · 2 answers · asked by lake wales shawty 1

2006-10-09 05:54:09 · 25 answers · asked by Codi V 1

2006-10-09 05:26:26 · 5 answers · asked by land.zero 1

2006-10-09 04:41:00 · 2 answers · asked by hay hay 1

2006-10-09 04:16:29 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

How is volcanism related to plate boundaries?

2006-10-09 04:12:55 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

Modern Geology estimates the age of the earth to be 4.5 billion years. This is not
universally accepted as fact. Would there be a conflict between the theory of Plate
Tectonics and the idea of a much younger Earth?

2006-10-09 04:10:14 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

The underground nuclear bomb explotions (like north korea) apparently creates a shockwave that is detected as an "artifical" earthquake. There are numerous seismic problems in Japan by natural geological processes. Is the nuclear explosion strong enough to trigger an unattended consequence (i.e. tip the balance for a major earthquake of natural causes)? There were a lot of these tests done in Nevada which is not far from California's San Andreas fault. Does that mean the forces involved are just not strong enough to significantly impact natural geological processes?

2006-10-09 03:20:13 · 6 answers · asked by timespiral 4

2006-10-09 03:05:51 · 8 answers · asked by Steph :-) 3

2006-10-09 02:40:12 · 32 answers · asked by Snow queen 2

2006-10-09 01:37:03 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

why we will not get shock in the other end

2006-10-08 19:33:35 · 11 answers · asked by jayanta d 1

2006-10-08 18:31:46 · 10 answers · asked by oro916 1

A while back I located this large hole on Google earth, but I tried to show my brother this, and now can not find it anywhere. I thought it was North of Cape and South of St. Louis around the Iron mountain area in the Northeast section of the Mark Twain natl forrest. But I do not see it. Has anyone seen this, or know anything about it?

2006-10-08 18:01:29 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous

i was wondering i heard that a 3.0 is 100,000 times worse then a 2.0 same like a 6.0 and 5.0 just wondering

2006-10-08 17:04:10 · 4 answers · asked by Jay 2

Apparently the Romans did not recognize siltstone as a rock different from shale or sandstone. Thank you to all who tried to answer the question about the latin word for silt.

2006-10-08 16:28:34 · 3 answers · asked by David A 5

I've seen it on various sites and textbooks to be anywhere from the 20th to 22nd of June. On which date does it occur most often?

2006-10-08 14:55:22 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous