Earth Sciences & Geology - July 2006

Volume 10 million litres per year ?
Cost of set up?
Land area required?
Quality of water recovered?
End use of reclaimed water=farming

2006-07-21 10:21:08 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

because if there was no conception or perception or substance,there couldn't even have been a void?

2006-07-21 10:15:01 · 23 answers · asked by ♥cozicat♥ 5

Or what water turns into after the event.?

2006-07-21 09:49:56 · 29 answers · asked by doorseeker 1

Why or why not? Under what circumstances? For what purposes?

2006-07-21 07:55:37 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

I think it has no effect on the tides, it's all a myth, newton's 3rd law where there's action there's reaction. the tide is out in one part of the world and comes in at an other.

2006-07-21 07:48:16 · 19 answers · asked by Tom M 1

2006-07-21 07:33:55 · 3 answers · asked by dat dude 1

2006-07-21 06:28:58 · 15 answers · asked by kathy6500 3

i wanted to know about the sites for UFOS{UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECTS}

2006-07-21 06:08:02 · 7 answers · asked by aradhika_2 1

2006-07-21 04:30:12 · 5 answers · asked by ♥Live♥Laugh♥Love♥ 2

If you are standing right on the North Pole and take one step in any direction are you going south, regardless of the direction you take?

2006-07-21 04:23:50 · 29 answers · asked by loufedalis 7

Where did the term "high seas " ie, "he is off on the high seas" and are there bodies of water called the "low seas"

2006-07-21 03:17:36 · 2 answers · asked by loufedalis 7

2006-07-21 02:59:35 · 10 answers · asked by JOE 1

(i recently went to the singapore science centre and bought this limestone which contained crystal,so i broke it apart and found some shiny crystal like thing inside so i would like to ask if anybody knows what it really is...
pls help me

2006-07-21 02:46:21 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

There are stats that are irrefutable in the movie but the Neo Cons will chalk it all up to nonsense as they repeat what Fox News has put out to refute it.

It is so scary to me that folks blanket themselves in ignorance and expouse the exact same response: We have had ice ages and warming periods before. They miss the issue that the Artic ice contains records of temperatures and CO2 levels. We are approaching levels of CO2 never expercienced before. THe polar caps are melting - in our lifetimes - at unprecedented levels.

Would a neo-con be able to watch the Gore movie and then refute the claims or will they only be able to absorb what the major pervert O'Reilly tells them to believe on any given day?

2006-07-21 02:42:31 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

is it true that if the well is inclined to the principal stress then breakout direction may not always represent the min principa stress direction?

2006-07-21 02:37:32 · 2 answers · asked by toothpasate 1

How?

2006-07-21 02:12:31 · 19 answers · asked by Eve W 3

2006-07-21 01:11:08 · 21 answers · asked by camelspin 2

2006-07-21 00:11:24 · 14 answers · asked by mamanoelia 3

2006-07-21 00:00:56 · 8 answers · asked by mary_sconster 3

2006-07-20 21:11:32 · 7 answers · asked by Crooks Gap 5

2006-07-20 21:05:56 · 13 answers · asked by seema 2

2006-07-20 20:35:49 · 13 answers · asked by sphere_egypt 2

...tom science

2006-07-20 20:30:52 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

I mean, may its a big TV show , being watched people of some other planets and we are just some characters created by them.

2006-07-20 19:15:10 · 15 answers · asked by SUNIL Raj 3

2006-07-20 19:07:30 · 23 answers · asked by superdave 1

2006-07-20 16:50:54 · 6 answers · asked by michinoku2001 7

wher you can see your house from a satlitte angle

2006-07-20 14:55:30 · 6 answers · asked by tlthomas1@sbcglobal.net 1

Considering the Earths rotation and the laws of centrifigal force.

2006-07-20 14:39:10 · 10 answers · asked by averagebrian 1

Why cant religion and science work in co-operation, why do they have to be such mortal enemys? my personal thoughts are that they both drive to seek the same goal. science in a form of numerals and equations, and religion in flesh and faith. science seeks out answers to the world. religion also seeks these same answers, but in a different format. Take evolution for example, science says darwin, religion says god just poofed us to fit to our current state. why couldnt god have created us and then tweaked us over time using evolution??? it seems logical to me. he saw improvements to be needed, he improved. and the creation of the universe, science has many theorys but the biggest common agreed one is the big bang theory. religion says it was just wisked here all of a sudden. i dont understand why god could not have used the big bang method to create the universe? it has to always be such utter hate between the two when in fact they both drive the same questions.1 has equations, one faith

2006-07-20 14:34:25 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

The Bay is in the Atlantic on the Western Europe coast and seems to have rough seas a lot.

2006-07-20 14:10:18 · 1 answers · asked by crichtonmar 1