English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

There are stats that are irrefutable in the movie but the Neo Cons will chalk it all up to nonsense as they repeat what Fox News has put out to refute it.

It is so scary to me that folks blanket themselves in ignorance and expouse the exact same response: We have had ice ages and warming periods before. They miss the issue that the Artic ice contains records of temperatures and CO2 levels. We are approaching levels of CO2 never expercienced before. THe polar caps are melting - in our lifetimes - at unprecedented levels.

Would a neo-con be able to watch the Gore movie and then refute the claims or will they only be able to absorb what the major pervert O'Reilly tells them to believe on any given day?

2006-07-21 02:42:31 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Earth Sciences & Geology

2 answers

Put it this way: for every inconvenient truth there is a convenient lie, and some media prostitute to propagate it. And the frightening part is that many Americans will find it too much of an effort to make any sacrifice of their (our) present wasteful lifestyle and so will readily buy into the lies, knowing they can explain their sophistry to their children with the excuse of being misled. (Kind of like the current Iraq war excuse.)

2006-07-21 03:46:46 · answer #1 · answered by kirchwey 7 · 1 0

for some years, environmentalism has been the Left's ideal excuse for increasing government administration over our strikes in procedures the two great and small. it particularly is for mom Earth! it particularly is for the little ones! it particularly is for the whales! yet earlier, the doomsday-state of affairs environmental scares they have trumped up have not been sufficiently vast to grant the sinister prize they choose maximum of all: finished administration of yankee politics, financial activity, or perhaps individual habit. With international warming, in spite of the incontrovertible fact that, greenhouse gasbags can argue that vehicle emissions in Ohio threaten people in Paris, and that throughout elementary terms international government can handle such problems. nationwide sovereignty? Democracy? forget it: international warming has now further the Left closer to international government, statism, and the eradication of individual rights than it has ever been earlier.

2016-11-02 11:21:56 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers