Politics - 9 June 2007

2007-06-09 04:35:22 · 14 answers · asked by papaw_ 2 _8 1

The Federal Reserve is basically what keeps the United States running. It controls the finances for the government and is the central banking system in the US, and so on. If you look at who the last heads were, they were all Jews. Volcker, Greenspan, and Bernake are all Jews. It makes you wonder who actually controls what happens. I know I will be called a racist and ignorant, but I am stating the facts.

2007-06-09 04:22:53 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

I never understood why they like to breach contracts and not pay their bills.

I guess as a liberal I just don't understand lying deceptive business practices

2007-06-09 04:15:47 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

that whether one's service in the military is irrelevant to whether any military action is right or wrong? I was told when I was 20 years old by a friend (who was the local army recrutier) that I would not be allowed to serve in the army if I wanted to because of a medical condition (asthma). Does that disqualify my opinion on whether the war on terrorism is justifiable?

Of course the anti war crowd can't have an honest open debate of ideas. They'd lose every time.

2007-06-09 04:13:13 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

Hillary Clinton has said on many occasions that something has to be taken away from people for the common good.
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/column.aspx?UrlTitle=clinton_something_has_to_be_taken_away_from_some_people&ns=AmandaCarpenter&dt=06/04/2007&page=full&comments=true
She is of course referring to taking money away from people for government funded social programs.
Do we really want the government to decide "the common good?" Is this just another way to coerce the populace?
One only needs to judge the efficiency of FEMA vs the American Red Cross, a government agency designed to serve the common good vs a private enterprise that serves the common good.
How can a political body, which is influenced by lobbyists and other special interest groups, be trusted to decide the common good?
Is not the "common good" best served by private enterprise and non-profits like the American Red Cross and other such organizations?

2007-06-09 04:11:55 · 16 answers · asked by Perplexed Bob 5

When President Barrack HUSSEIN Obama becames Ruler of of the USA, will he attempt to get the house and senate to bow down to him, like Jesus is to bow down and praise the Mahdi?

Do you want to live under Sharia law?

2007-06-09 04:03:25 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why do liberals keep saying that Bush ran up a $9 trillion dollar debt with "his" war? Are they foolish enough to think the national debt was $0 when slick willy left office? Do they really think that the surplus was an actual surplus of the national debt? No, no one can be THAT dumb....can they?!?! It would make sense though. No wonder they are so mad. Jon Stewart told them all that bush spent $9 trillion dollars over the past 6 years. Where are all the "intellectuals"? Where are all the academic elite of democrat party? Why haven't they done a good job of explaining to the little folk what is really going on?

2007-06-09 04:01:20 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

I thought nancy pelosi was going to get rid of the corruption in congress and its someone from her own party.

2007-06-09 03:55:22 · 18 answers · asked by Jeremy P 2

For many people, the biggest draw to the democrat party is the promise of free hand outs. If democrats have a huge base of people due to their worthless social programs, what is their incentive to bring people out of poverty? If a party is "for the poor" how can they help you become rich? Do their policies ever help poor people become wealthy, or just give them enough hand outs to keep them alive until the next election?

2007-06-09 03:33:31 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous

I'm 26, so I don't need their lame social security plans. I'm white, so race bating won't work. I'm a guy, so they can't promise me the opportunity to legally murder my first born, and I'm straight, so I don't care about the right to marry another man. My main concerns are keeping the economy going as it is now, keeping illegals out, and keeping my family from being beheaded or blown up by psycho terrorists. Am I wrong here, or is there really a place in the democrat party for an educated, independent person that doesn't want hand outs and isn't easily wooed by the promise of social programs aimed at the poor, ie, not me? Strangely, the democrats don't seem to fit my needs.

2007-06-09 03:30:05 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

I know the slu-tty mom called Arnold!!!!!!! = A republican

Please just answer the question.

The Hiltons did contributed a lot to Bush = Typical conservatives (fakes)

2007-06-09 03:13:26 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-09 02:41:55 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

I thought liberals said that Bush stole the 2000 and 2004 elections? Did his diebold machines not work? Did his countless efforts to suppress all the brown people in America somehow fail? I don't understand how Bush and Karl Rove could pull off such amazingly cunning election frauds twice, but somehow let it slip away in 06? Also, why do liberals even bother to vote in 08 in all the elections are rigged? Obviously someone forgot to rig a few ballot boxes in 06, but that couldn't happen twice in a row, could it? That would also seem like the elections were....fair!?!?

2007-06-09 02:35:14 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

This infatuation they have with Ron Paul is hilarious. I constantly hear liberals say "Ron Paul is the only shot the GOP has in 08" or "Ron Paul is a republican I actually respect. He sounds like someone I could vote for." Gee, big shot there. Do liberals not realize that when they "see a guy they could vote" for this means he has zero chance? When liberals think he is well-informed and pro-American, doesn't that make them wonder what shot he has with the other normal half of America? Don't be surprised if Ron Paul doesn't even win his district, let alone the GOP nomination.

2007-06-09 02:32:03 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

In 1991, Ted Kennedy (among others, used President Bush's desire to act in a bipartisan manner to work out a deal for a tax increase, which of course violated the President's NO New Taxes Campaign pledge. This got Bill Clinton elected President.
Now, Ted Kennedy has sucked Republican Sen.s Kyle, Graham, McCain and others into supporting a bill (which is already partially responsible for getting some Republicans voted out of office) which probably will be their political death. Unfortunately, the Democrats always have someone to run to replace these Republicans and the constituents NEVER seem to realize that they are worse off with the Democrat.
I wonder when Republicans will ever learn that NO Democrat has the best interest of the nation in mind?

2007-06-09 01:00:35 · 13 answers · asked by plezurgui 6