Politics - 8 September 2006

what is your reason?...
some say "gore says things so they must be true"..or "real scientists have proven him wrong"

if either of these are your reasons--
prove gore wrong by using sources or scientists who are not currently accepting money from the oil industry.

otherwise, admit you're just too lazy to do any research yourself and prefer to spew nonsense.

2006-09-08 05:38:51 · 8 answers · asked by bush-deathgrip 1

Clinton had numerous chances to get rid of Osama. The CIA, NSA, and our special forces all had bin laden within their sights and was waiting word from the "big boss" How do you Dems explain that?

2006-09-08 05:37:09 · 12 answers · asked by TJ 4

when they have been FOUND IN IRAQ?

Do people really not follow this sort of thing?

Will any of you change your opinions because of this, or will you blindly follow the liberal line and find some reason the WMDs "don't count"?

Link (don't worrky, its not a long read): http://www.washtimes.com/national/20060710-123909-1428r.htm

2006-09-08 05:33:33 · 13 answers · asked by Ricky T 6

Both environmentally and politically. Gore served a good apprenticeship under Clinton and frankly has more Statesman credibility than Pres Chimp or Hill. Clinton or Condi 'overpromoted' Rice. Lets all support Gore to save America.?

2006-09-08 05:30:59 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous

Normally, Islam teaches many good moral value for average human beings. Few may become terrrorists. but why ordinary American pronounces hard wards when they reply about terrorists of Islam in Yahoo. (I am not Muslim or Christian)

2006-09-08 05:24:41 · 9 answers · asked by adraya 2

People see voting for a third party as "throwing their vote away" because our two party system is so rooted in our beliefs. But honestly, don't you think it's time we get another party in this mix? Things in this world aren't purely black and white, there is a ton of gray area. Lets dillute that ellection pool so things can change. Who wants to vote democrat, or republican anymore? They are both corrupt, and strictly out for power. Each represented party is backed by multiple big business influences. Why not throw in a third of forth idea in the mix? Why do we have to choose between theRepublican identity and "Stay the Course, no matter what!" or Democratic philosophy "Blame the Conservatives!"? My question is "Why don't more people vote independent? Might not believe in the indepedent party message, but atleast to get them recognition on the scene"

2006-09-08 05:23:32 · 7 answers · asked by kris_rynshall 3

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-090806miniseries,0,6530988.story?coll=la-home-headlines
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/08/washington/08film.html?_r=1&ref=us&oref=slogin

2006-09-08 05:23:26 · 15 answers · asked by erictompkins1970 2

compared to what Bush is doing?

2006-09-08 05:20:52 · 31 answers · asked by TJ 4

2006-09-08 05:18:35 · 17 answers · asked by farrukh s 1

I don't get why ABC is making that mean movie about Bill Clinton. He said that it didn't happen the way the movie makes it look. I believe him. Why would he lie?

It's not like there are any classified documents anywhere that back up the movie's claim. Does anyone know of any? I bet Bill Clinton doesn't know of any, or even Sandy Berger. That's because THEY DON'T EXIST





































anymore.

2006-09-08 05:16:31 · 16 answers · asked by BrianthePigEatingInfidel 4

It seems free speach only applies to those who freely speak ideas approved by the left. Do you agree?

2006-09-08 05:14:15 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

Even though they are his propogandist-in-chief, even GWB thinks FOX are the bottom of the barrel.

2006-09-08 05:13:20 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

Is he making a persuasive case that Republicans are best on security issues? Or, does "ho-hum" describe your reacton?

2006-09-08 05:09:09 · 14 answers · asked by ? 5

do you think our soldiers are in jeopardy of the same in the future?

If so, would we be able to prosecute the offenders for war crimes?

2006-09-08 05:05:47 · 29 answers · asked by Dastardly 6

How many people think the upside of this war is that it is culling off all the brainwashed, high school underachieving rednecks that are willing to die for a war to secure oil and reconstruction contracts for a drunk cokehead president who AWOl'd his own Air Reserve duties. Isn't it great that a limitless supply of "conservative" dimwits are preventing a draft?
I love that these red staters are running off for a useless suicide mission (thanks for the <$3 gas!). That leaves the smart ones, the ones not fooled! Darwinism at its greatest.

2006-09-08 05:04:20 · 14 answers · asked by Duque de Alba 3

That's what John Skerry II's said.



Seious question:What kind of shape is whole rabbid right-wing loserville neo-con thing gotten itself into if it represent silly sexual questions like this?

Another reason to leave the Republican party,as I have...?

2006-09-08 05:00:17 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

I have been watching the series of speeches the President has given over the past week, The noticeable fact is whilst the 'friendly' crowds were respectful of the Presidency they were cringing with embarrassment at the man. Anybody else noticed?

2006-09-08 04:59:31 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-08 04:57:41 · 15 answers · asked by dstr 6

2006-09-08 04:51:44 · 12 answers · asked by Olive Green Eyes 5

After one month they can revert back to their original faith. All patriotic Indians pls answer.

2006-09-08 04:50:41 · 15 answers · asked by Indian 1

As GWB leaves the smoking gun at the door of European countries who had already denied they were involved in the 'Extraordinary Rendition' episode, Is it ever acceptable a civilized nation like ours should ever involve itself in acts of torture?

Albeit in friendly European countries (who are now being indicted) and not on our soil.

2006-09-08 04:47:02 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous

I keep seing posts, specially john skerry II with nothing but insults, specially things refering to homosexuals. What is the deal?

2006-09-08 04:41:09 · 15 answers · asked by Enterrador 4

I don't understand how the two are related. Aren't the people that are against the war the ones who want to bring our troops safely home? I don't think anyone in the country (except that crazy Baptist group that protests soldier's funerals) is against the soldiers.

2006-09-08 04:39:35 · 39 answers · asked by Salem 5

And again Bush honers the wealthy with special deals.

2006-09-08 04:39:08 · 7 answers · asked by 43 5

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/03/23/clarke/index.html

President Clinton, through his attorney, rebuked ABC for producing a "factually and incontrovertibly inaccurate" miniseries -- and walked the network through three make-believe scenes in the "the Path to 9/11" that defame people and misrepresent events during his administration. Clinton's spokesman later stepped up the pressure, condemning Disney as "despicable" for "airing a fictional version of what is a serious and emotional event for our country. No reputable organization," he said, "should dramatize 9-11 for a profit at the expense of the truth." The families of September 11 victims have weighed in on the controversy, telling "entertainers" not to "promote misleading or incorrect information as fact to the public." House and Senate Democratic leaders hammered Disney president and CEO Robert Iger, in letters that questioned the company's commitment to its "reputation ... as a corporation worthy of the trust of the American people and the United States Congress." Scholastic has pulled teaching materials off its website and has scrambled to adopt a plan to help teachers show students "the differences between factual reporting and a dramatization," but is still encouraging teachers to show their students this propaganda
I hear ABC is back in the edit room with “Path to 9/11” LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2006-09-08 04:38:09 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

Because there's alot in this world I find as reviling as Bush's revile for Saddam "war on terror" in Iraq - therefore - am I as justified in killing to meet my own goals? I would say Bush's justification of his wrath and for death is even less justified than my own. Therefore, logically, I have as much right, if not more, than Bush to bring death to others to meet my goals?

2006-09-08 04:32:18 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-08 04:32:12 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

As we near the anniversary of the 9/11 disaster, why has no one ever, ever, yet come up with an explanation as to why Building 7 collapsed into a neat pile, whilst buildings nearer the towers stayed intact.

2006-09-08 04:32:06 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous

Can a QB lead a 4th Quareter comeback when he throws more Intercepsions than Completions, more Sacks than Completions, More Blown Easy Throws than Completions.
What is the matter with the Dunce.

2006-09-08 04:30:06 · 7 answers · asked by heart4brains 1

Once again the wealthy get a free pass

2006-09-08 04:26:38 · 19 answers · asked by 43 5