Current Events - February 2007

2007-02-15 00:14:12 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-02-15 00:01:30 · 17 answers · asked by Modest intellect 4

2007-02-14 23:50:12 · 4 answers · asked by jammy.greeny@talk21.com 1

today the terrorism is a world wide phenomina .almost all the countries of the world are suffering from terrorism activity .these countries are fighting with their own way theis is no harmony or link between the victim countries . i think this is the biggest mistake in our plan terroristb are only misguided person they can be victim of circumstances policies. they should be try to convience to join the main streat of life.i think bilateral talks betwen the government and terrorist organisation should be stablish to metigate their problems.our police militerly personal should be trained specially to handel trhe government should give proper attention to on the development plans .

2007-02-14 23:37:28 · 23 answers · asked by akansha s 1

How can everyone out their moan and groan about england banning smoking in public places. The difference it has made to scotland is immense. Stop going on about your human rights etc and go visit a cancer ward in your local hospital. There are innocent barstaff getting passive smoking because smoking is still allowed in pubs etc. People keep saying well they should work somewhere else, why should they? They need a job too.
I am not anti smoking - I am a smoker myself and the fact that the smoking ban in glasgow happened well I moaned about it before it happened then realised, actually its great, I dont smoke half of what I used to and I enjoy having fun in a club which is smoke free and coming home with my clothes still smelling fresh and my hair clean.
All of you against this should shutup and realise the facts that are all against you.

2007-02-14 23:29:43 · 70 answers · asked by Melanie 1

2007-02-14 22:53:48 · 5 answers · asked by kaznmolly 1

What do you think?

2007-02-14 22:23:44 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Please explain why you have come to that conclusion. Thanks!

2007-02-14 22:21:14 · 12 answers · asked by TheAnswerChicks 4

The government are giving local councils £30 million, so they can employ thousands of staff to catch people having a cigarette when the smoking ban in public places comes into force in July!!There is going to be COVERT operations in pubs, clubs,restaurants, etc, etc, etc.I'm sure there are hundreds of other worthwhile causes this money could be going on. Is it just me, or are we ALL going barmy?

2007-02-14 21:54:48 · 19 answers · asked by pageys 5

outbreak as some of his practices are surely breaking environmental guidelines fot breeding poultry. How can it be healthy to keep thousands of birds caged under the same roof. Common sense would say that it is unhygenic to do this surely.


How do you see it and do you think he should be penalised...trouble is if he is so will everyone else who is associated with his business.

2007-02-14 21:44:58 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

It is hard to trust the US intellingence after they cried wolf about WMD's in Iraq and Bush put the US in a War without end. Now he says that Iran is providing weapons to the insurgence in Iraq. Do you trust him at this point?

2007-02-14 21:00:09 · 15 answers · asked by Electrobird 5

2007-02-14 20:43:24 · 16 answers · asked by nobody-but-me 1

With the ban soon to come into force, do you think that it will be self regulating, or are we likely to see continual news stories about fines issued to people who have been cayght smoking in public places ?

2007-02-14 20:31:36 · 157 answers · asked by www.shutup.com 2

Yeah, I think Iraq has been a huge ****-up!

2007-02-14 19:46:08 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-02-14 19:45:08 · 5 answers · asked by Fipa 2

2007-02-14 19:39:33 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

What is with the accusations now of Iran supplying insurgent fighters in Iraq. Seems like Bush is pushing this idea pretty hard in past couple of days. What do you think?

2007-02-14 19:18:57 · 23 answers · asked by Coco32 1

will the democrats take the responsible after we leave Iraq, giving the terrorist time to regroup and attack us again like 9/11.
or Iran using a nuke?

2007-02-14 19:15:53 · 12 answers · asked by collectorbob810 3

2007-02-14 19:12:42 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

on easter day of 2005 police see a vehicle suspected in a hit and run they try to pull vehicle over but vehicle resistes when do pull over police has suspicion of weapon the pasenger flees as the driver is stepping out of vehicle then off police video camera not knowing the truth or the whole story suspect gets fired at from police officer then not long after is pronounced dead at hospital/

2007-02-14 18:45:54 · 1 answers · asked by jennifer o 1

Seems it's getting closer as the public is massaged more and more in preparation by news like so:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070215/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush_22

2007-02-14 18:19:19 · 13 answers · asked by gene_frequency 7

2007-02-14 18:01:19 · 7 answers · asked by Sandy E 1

in the past year??

2007-02-14 17:26:24 · 13 answers · asked by [robot] =] 2

Under the law the president can't single handedly let foreigners into the country without a vote in congress which is what he is trying to do. Of these 7,000 Iraqis no one knows who they are or if any number of them could be terrorist jihadists from Al Queda or other type of splinter group.

Also the law clearly states that people from any country that doesn't allow criminals back into their country (as Iraq does) can not be given visas into America, period. When Condoleeza Rice was asked about this law, she simply stated "Iraqis have enough problems" and she was very dismissive as if the law doesn't matter at all.

I don't know anyone who wants to let more terrorists into this country. And they plan on letting even more in. I'm wondering if the President has lost his sense of connection with the American people altogether.

2007-02-14 17:11:31 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

can someone please post me a link to this report,it just came out.

2007-02-14 16:49:46 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

We do people always protest after its too late. Why can't we exert pressure on dictatorial regimes before then present us iminent threat? If we would have, as a nation, refused to buy OPEC and middle eastern oil then Iraq would not have been suspected of using money to buy uranium. we could have avoided war. Why can't people stop complaining so much about our prolonged current military campaign, and exert energy trying to prevent another one? WHY CAN'T WE STOP IRAN?

2007-02-14 16:38:43 · 5 answers · asked by Robert C 1

Logic leads to one conclusion: To build a dossier and drum up public support for an illegal act of aggression

2007-02-14 16:12:05 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-02-14 15:49:29 · 21 answers · asked by Mukesh K 1

And what are you doing to prepare?

2007-02-14 15:43:27 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

In what ways is it better, and/or what ways is it worse?

2007-02-14 15:35:58 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous