English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-02-14 19:45:08 · 5 answers · asked by Fipa 2 in News & Events Current Events

5 answers

OIl of course.

That is the only reason Bush & Blair went there.

There were never ever weapons of Mass Destruction.

The USA & GREAT BRITTAIN are responsible for millions of deaths, suffering of innocent people & devastation in that poor country.

We BRITISH cannot hold our heads high when we visit other countries because of the shame these little sad human beings have imposed upon us.

Whatever respect that Britain had earned in trading with the world over many hundreds of years has been lost.

Furthermore the world is an unsafe place & we have yet worse to come.

2007-02-15 01:15:57 · answer #1 · answered by ANDREW H 4 · 0 0

The answer is simple, the country is too unstable at the moment. If we pulled all the troops out they would have mass civil war. With a lot more of their people dying than there is now.

If we allowed that to happens, who knows who would gain control eventually. Potentially threatening world security.

Also if we did that, USA would then be accused of "doing nothing" and the Muslim world would turn against them.

Hang on a minute!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2007-02-14 20:02:56 · answer #2 · answered by Paul C 6 · 0 0

Sadam is dead,
the oil is not

2007-02-14 21:14:41 · answer #3 · answered by the vet 4 · 0 1

Waiting for after (Saddam) effects.

2007-02-14 21:04:30 · answer #4 · answered by Jaff 4 · 0 0

For the OIL WELL. we aint in there for the sand baby.

2007-02-14 20:36:24 · answer #5 · answered by ktbaron 3 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers