outbreak as some of his practices are surely breaking environmental guidelines fot breeding poultry. How can it be healthy to keep thousands of birds caged under the same roof. Common sense would say that it is unhygenic to do this surely.
How do you see it and do you think he should be penalised...trouble is if he is so will everyone else who is associated with his business.
2007-02-14 21:44:58 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
This is not the first time he has been involved in something of this nature.
2007-02-14 22:17:43 · update #1
Why should he be penalised when he pays so much money to Labour.
2007-02-15 01:05:09 · answer #1 · answered by ANDREW H 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Whilst I certaintly dont agree with the battery farm techniques - which probably contributed to the rapid spread once the virus was there. The hardest part of course is establishing where the virus came from and I find the pracitce of transporting part processed meat back and forth across Europe dubious business - the issue as to whether he lied about where the birds in Hungary came from is disturbing as he has claimed one thing and there is now evidence that it does not tally with the facts. What disturbs me more is the manner in which the government were so keen to back and support him before establishing any facts.
If the firm is found to have broken a law or contributed to the increased hazard and risk due to any of its practices then a simple means is fine the man himself he is worth some £305 m so punitive punishment ithout hurting the workers!
2007-02-14 22:12:02 · answer #2 · answered by Gilly S 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Not Bernard Matthews as such, the thing is the company hasn't actually been breaking any guidelines. Whilst most people would surely agree that keeping birds in such conditions is cruel it isn't technically illegal. Secondly Bernard Matthews took every step required to keep the outbreak under control.
I don't agree with factory farming. It is unpleasant, but as long as there are plenty of people prepared to accept it in return for cheap poultry products then I can't see any legislation coming in to stop it.
2007-02-14 22:36:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
a fit punishment for his crime on turkey's and humanity would be to process him, stick stuffing up his harris tweed and roast him at his factory gates as a warning that avian bird flu could mutate and cause a global pandemic. Or is it a ploy by the gang of idiots in government- less UK to deflect criticism of an out of control prime minister. David Miliband could be used as the stuffing.
2007-02-14 21:56:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Ok, no one got sick, and they're suffering already by sales of their products being down. That is the biggest "responsibility" they'll have to take: getting their customers to believe them and want to eat their products.
Will saying sorry help? Not really. They've got an upward PR battle on their hands and they know it.
Anyone for ham this Christmas?
2007-02-14 21:53:37 · answer #5 · answered by MomMom 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i'm perplexed, does this propose i won't be in a position to consume turkish satisfaction anymore, it is not honest, i like turkish satisfaction, no longer the crap style nonetheless, no longer the type coated in infant powder. the stunning type with the chocolate. MMMMMMMMMM TASTY. it is basically no longer honest.
2016-10-02 04:18:09 · answer #6 · answered by Erika 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
On Matters that I Don,t really Know the facts I prefer not to Foist my opinons on anyone else --Perhaps you would give it due consideration ???
2007-02-14 22:04:32 · answer #7 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
people should visit inside one of these battery farms just to see how horrendous they actually are.
2007-02-14 22:43:46 · answer #8 · answered by jeff hall 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
How about u get along with your own life u sad nobody
2007-02-14 21:47:32 · answer #9 · answered by Chris S 1 · 3⤊ 1⤋
think golden drummers will be cheap
2007-02-14 21:49:00 · answer #10 · answered by robbo1974 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋