I have PCs that run memory intensive games like gears of war. I had a 2.2 celeron that was blowing away my one 3.2 P4 simply because of the video card. I have even had identical chipset graphic cards in two machines, but the slowe pci beat out the agp because it had 128mb on it while the agp had 64.
Does anyone else think that consumers concentrate too much on the CPU and not the graphics processing unit (GPU). The Wii is sporty a 512 MB ati card. I couldn't dream of affording to put something like that in my pc right now. As far as I have , the PS3 is using a 512 MB Nvidia GPU.
I know CPU is important, but isn't the GPU much more important. For the difference in money? Especially since even 1080p is normal resolution (not high) res on some of the pc games i play. The Wii has 480p. Unless you are actually going to hook it up to a 60"LCD 1080p, i don't think you would know the difference,a nd even then that is too low of a resolution for such a large display.
2007-01-08
10:48:00
·
6 answers
·
asked by
bjmarchini
2
in
Video & Online Games