Philosophy - November 2006

See title...

2006-11-21 18:39:00 · 12 answers · asked by Village L 1

2006-11-21 18:38:43 · 4 answers · asked by jonas_tripps_79 2

2006-11-21 18:32:49 · 3 answers · asked by 123 1

life is like a deficient book for everybody which has only some pages from the middle.so we couldnt find out all its secrets.and we must encounter with calmly and causiously.
religion is ethics and loving others.money is a means to get the proper and excellent expectations.
heaven is not mean to give more you want.but it needs you do your best.

2006-11-21 17:33:53 · 9 answers · asked by virtual1347 1

2006-11-21 17:25:23 · 17 answers · asked by Pretty_Bad_Logic 3

I think that the first thing that God created is LOVE.
And everything else was created through love.

That truth is like a ultiple sided prism, and it is humanly impossible to see all the sides.

????????

2006-11-21 17:10:27 · 16 answers · asked by Pink Rose 2

"If we are going to teach 'creation science' as an alternative to evolution, then we should also teach the stork theory as an alternative to biological reproduction." [Judith Hayes]

2006-11-21 17:03:36 · 15 answers · asked by Subconsciousless 7

2006-11-21 16:56:12 · 20 answers · asked by ronald m 2

After THAT Divine Incarnation Day, Post 23rd November 1926, What are those changes that came to the World, in all aspects ...?

2006-11-21 16:44:45 · 2 answers · asked by jayakrishnaathmavidya 4

I am of the opinion that all human love including romantic love is subject to meeting mutual expectations. In that sense how deep human love is, can only be described with respect to it's intensity. So human love, I think can only be described on a scale for example 1 to 10, 1 meaning the least degree of love and 10 meaning the highest degree of human love where one will not hesitate to put his/her life on line for another.

But even at the highest degree, can human love be considered absolute like agape love?

2006-11-21 16:30:12 · 22 answers · asked by stvenryn 4

If this being is omnipotent, then every occurrence, including every human action, every human thought, and every human feeling and aspiration is also His work; how is it possible to think of holding men responsible for their deeds and thoughts before such an almighty Being? In giving out punishment and rewards He would to a certain extent be passing judgment on Himself. How can this be combined with the goodness and righteousness ascribed to Him? [Albert Einstein, Out of My Later Years (New York: Philosophical Library, 1950), p. 27.]

2006-11-21 16:29:58 · 20 answers · asked by Subconsciousless 7

Is there any light you can shed for me to expand my understanding and insight into synchronicity?

2006-11-21 16:10:56 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-21 16:03:39 · 26 answers · asked by jasonhenrybaker2 1

If it's a person or a pet the question is why aren't you with them right now. If you answer is a computer please explain WHY?

2006-11-21 15:53:11 · 13 answers · asked by Pretty_Bad_Logic 3

Please...be creative. Dont tell me the obvious. (Unless what is obvious for you is unusual for others;))

2006-11-21 15:34:47 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-21 15:31:13 · 21 answers · asked by UVM 1

Are there more deaths by natural causes or by murder?

2006-11-21 15:13:04 · 9 answers · asked by Gypsy 2

And then what was prolly the first animal to eat it?

2006-11-21 15:09:39 · 13 answers · asked by Shaide 2

2006-11-21 14:43:32 · 14 answers · asked by ayok 2

2006-11-21 14:35:01 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

If we get pass war and all of our planets threats and universal threats and evolved again(along with some animals)what do you think we'd look like?

2006-11-21 14:26:40 · 9 answers · asked by jkuraah 1

of your life?

2006-11-21 14:19:02 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

because not all Y residents are highly-educated. The rural areas' residents did not receive good education, these people are often unable to distinguish right from the wrong, easily influenced by their emotions and religions, or be used by people with such motives.

I think that's rubbish. How can I argue with him? (I want an argument that will stand logically)

2006-11-21 14:07:00 · 4 answers · asked by English Learner 2

so i can prove that money can buy happiness in fact to prove that i am not as greedy as a billionaire i will accept just 1/4 of a million but NO I WILL NOT SELL MY SOUL FOR IT SO DONT EVEN ASK!

2006-11-21 13:49:20 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-21 13:38:14 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

I am song writing and have temporaly exhasted my supply of ideas

Any words that you live or qoutes or things that mean something would help
tks

2006-11-21 13:31:19 · 12 answers · asked by random_398 1

Like the famous song says?

2006-11-21 13:07:22 · 9 answers · asked by crow lover 3

Bacause you thought about it! Until you tackle other individuals' thought, it would be a good idea to tackle your own. Is this impossible due to the whole socialisation process? Or, because no thought can be original and therefore not your own? What if then, hypothetically, a person had no contact with another? It seems apparent that most, if not all, persons have no thoughts of their own. So, without using the predicate of logic or the ideas of other individuals, explain 'thought', and while you're at it, explain existence. Use your own thoughts to explain your own existence. No plagiarism (spelling of this word is uncertain?)

2006-11-21 13:02:12 · 17 answers · asked by plop 3

2006-11-21 12:46:07 · 4 answers · asked by H 2

2006-11-21 12:33:15 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous