This is true>
A women with 2 kids works her butt off to make ends meet. She got herself of of welfare and got rid of bum husband.
She gets a ticket for driving without insurance. Her license is suspended for 90 days. Plus fine.
Man gets a DUI (first, but has 8 total from the past). He has no insurance or drivers license (suspended from DUI more than 5 years ago). He gets license suspended for 90 days plus fine.
The man can get a hardship license after 30 days. The women can't (not even if she gets insurance).
The women has never had a drink in her life or any kind of a criminal record. She can't get a hardship license to drive to work but the drunk can get back on the road after 30 days.
She lost a very good job and had to get back on welfare. I know that she shouldn't of been driving without insurance. That is not the point of my question.
Is it fair to let a drunk back on the road, who is a serious danger. While women is kept off the road just because she is poor?
2006-08-07
00:02:01
·
3 answers
·
asked by
mike h
2
in
Law Enforcement & Police