English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Economics - December 2006

[Selected]: All categories Social Science Economics

Please do not copy/paste from wikipedia, I've already looked there but still didn't really understand it completely.

2006-12-30 09:59:36 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-30 07:06:54 · 8 answers · asked by psychedelic_fighter 2

By 2006 please? Any place on the net I can refer too?

2006-12-30 06:29:01 · 3 answers · asked by Ahmed S 1

2006-12-30 05:15:53 · 3 answers · asked by Del 1

Is 3% still considered standard, or have most recent cost-of-living increases reflected a higher annual percentage rate?

2006-12-30 00:56:33 · 7 answers · asked by Curious 1

2006-12-30 00:29:32 · 2 answers · asked by aluja 1

2006-12-30 00:07:17 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

The following regression relates to the price level (PGNP) with the base year 1985 to the exchange rate (EXCH) in pesos per dollar:

PGNP= -44.01304+9.176165EXCH,
t (-3.14) (12.65)


where R^2=.88, n=23,F=160.04

i. Compute for the standard error of each coefficient.
ii. Is the slope coefficient statistically different from zero? Show the appropriate test.
iii. Interpret the slope coefficient. Does it make economic sense?

2006-12-29 21:01:18 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

If half the 2006 DOD budget of $442 billion (not counting $85 billion supplemental) were invested elsewhere (infrastructure, education, subsidies, direct foreign aid) would the rate of return be higher? Has anyone tried to quantify the value of geo-political capital that hegemony provides? Is it worth the investment?
Serious answers only please, take your vitriol elsewhere.

2006-12-29 20:45:58 · 3 answers · asked by Mark P 5

If so how did you educate yourself when it came to stock markets?

2006-12-29 20:30:34 · 5 answers · asked by Ridin' Dirty 2

Im not an expert, but geez, the rates are ridculous!!!

2006-12-29 18:59:50 · 12 answers · asked by **twin** 4

2006-12-29 16:41:46 · 2 answers · asked by 311Fanx0 2

Would it be better if we revert back to the knowledge and beliefs prior to the era of enlightenment?

2006-12-29 16:01:26 · 2 answers · asked by iMpErFeCt 1

2006-12-29 15:13:18 · 11 answers · asked by The Editor 2

Chase was also on the 10,000 bill. Anyone have any interesting insight on this?

2006-12-29 12:07:04 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

What sort of best friends are they , who would make us pay every penny and interest after 60 years.?

2006-12-29 09:32:36 · 19 answers · asked by Tracker 5

My take on it is that having a minimum wage sets a defacto price for low end labor thus removing the natural self regulating price that a true free market provides. It would be impossble for all of the burger joints and car washes in the country to colude to set the price for labor. If the minimum wage were to be abolished all together, this would actually cause wages to rise because each employer would then have to set the price based on market forces. If the government tells all employers how much to charge for labor then they will simply all charge that rate and not have to pay competative wages.

2006-12-29 09:07:54 · 14 answers · asked by hose_b 3

a.a teenager who is searching for a first job?b.an autoworker who has been dismissed and would like to work but has given up hope of finding work?c.A retired person who moved to florida reads the want ads to find a part time job?d.a person who works part time,wants a fulltime job,but doesnot have time to look?

2006-12-29 08:15:03 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous

Nanotechnology has been on the forefront of many peoples minds for years. Scientists, engineers, and nonprofessionals are all working towards a goal of machines that are able to manipulate matter on a molecular or atomic scale. The possibilities are near endless with applications in medicine, construction, and even military. The US federal government has even started to develop laws to guide, limit, and institute the technology even if it may be years from fruition.
How can the common person expect to see a technology that could grind the global economies to a halt? Imagine having the capability to create food, clean water, and shelter from something self-replicating. Money would become meaningless. The people that have the capability to unleash the potential also stand to lose the most from it, how can we expect that to happen?

2006-12-29 08:08:03 · 3 answers · asked by carmicheal99 1

I seriously and absolutely think so, What About you?

2006-12-29 07:19:31 · 15 answers · asked by Barca Fan 2

If you do try visiting South America.

2006-12-29 07:11:31 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

Iraq is hard to explain now and in spite of these bad situation , we still hopeful people but we need to be togethr now to build our home , the country of civilizations , of the greatst rivers , of the several cultuers ....., but we don't know how to be one hand !

2006-12-29 06:54:40 · 2 answers · asked by Sara 3

2006-12-29 05:37:46 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-29 05:03:40 · 13 answers · asked by angel d 1

Don't get me wrong. I'm a big fan. But economically speaking: Do the values generated by Wikipedia get lost because there is no money involved?

In other words, is that money missing from the GDP, whereas if Wikipedia would charge for their services, there would be a corresponding increase in GDP?

2006-12-29 04:36:37 · 9 answers · asked by Ejsenstejn 2

I was thinking...the problem with lotteries these days is they are so one-dimensional and uninspirational....

Do you think the U.S. government and perhaps the EU should hold a joint a space lottery to allow an ordinary citizen to go into space rather than just all these billionaires?

I know they are talking about space travel by plane by 2020 etc but it seems to me that a space lottery would fire up world imagination, progress developments in alternative technologies and produce income for the government for eg: environemental research.....

2006-12-29 03:44:20 · 3 answers · asked by sailing c 1

fedest.com, questions and answers