Economics - October 2006

2006-10-17 04:27:50 · 8 answers · asked by satyamrajput_0 2

2006-10-17 04:12:07 · 1 answers · asked by bobby j 1

i was bored and worndering that.

2006-10-17 03:10:33 · 7 answers · asked by isee1you 1

-Case study regarding one incident of consumer exploitaion and decisions regarding consumer courts.
-I would be greatful if could also specify details like:-
a)The Judge
b)Who filed the case and against which organisation.
c)The date when the case was filed and also when verdict was announced.
d) Some other important information and details regarding.

Please help me with this and i can help you get points!!!!

2006-10-17 03:03:34 · 1 answers · asked by B. P 1

2006-10-17 02:47:28 · 5 answers · asked by stefan 3

How we young adults manage our money and credits.

2006-10-17 02:17:47 · 6 answers · asked by diioxyde 1

2006-10-17 00:44:06 · 9 answers · asked by markusmanning 1

2006-10-16 19:13:11 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

if we understand or define costs as including fairpay for the workinput of owners, as well as employee costs, overheads, advertising, accounting, costs of materials [which are ultimately labour costs] etc, then profits BY DEFINITION have to be money for no work = injustice [legal theft or beggary] = overpay, causing wealth concentration, causing tyranny, ie, the destruction of democracy?
is it rocksolid that there is nothing to limit profits to fair return to owners? - ie, that, after they have been paid fair returns for their labour, there is nothing stopping returns to go in excess of this, which by definition are money for no work?
profits can be for reasons of scarcity, monopoly, etc which are clearly not money for work, & therefore must cause work for no money [= underpay, wageslavery, slavery, evergrowing injustice, causing evergrowing violence [= misery], necessarily escalative to extinction [selfmurder of 6-7 billion]
it is IMPOSSIBLE for there to be doubt of this - yes?

2006-10-16 18:43:07 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

if this is so what will i do about the issue of personal morality

2006-10-16 18:37:15 · 5 answers · asked by proudirishpinoy 1

if this is so what will i do about the issue of personal morality

2006-10-16 18:36:58 · 5 answers · asked by proudirishpinoy 1

2006-10-16 18:11:24 · 3 answers · asked by mkenya halisi 2

2006-10-16 18:07:10 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

neither theoretical communism nor historical communism [after communism was hijacked by thugs] was anywhere near limited fortunes - limited fortunes is about getting back to democracy, liberty & justice for all - getting back to the american dream [& the idea of every wise person & the lesson of every bit of history] of just, limited fortunes, ensuring democracy, liberty & justice, peace, fraternity, longevity of the state
the enemy was wealth concentration - wealth = power, overwealth = overpower = tyranny
the founding fathers obviously understood that wealth concentration was inimical to democracy, freedom, safety, peace, law, order, everything good -
americans obviously didnt
now the american [& human] dream of liberty & justice for all, democracy, has been so hijacked by unlimited fortunes, that americans think limited fortunes has something to do with communism
the writing is on the wall for america, as for communism: the state built on injustice still cannot stand

2006-10-16 18:02:58 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-16 15:30:33 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

cant no govt control also be disastrous?
t or f arg: govt control has always been disastrous, therefore govt control always will be disastrous?
t or f fact: govt control always has been disastrous? [all capitalist economies are mixed to some degree] [limited-fortunes [lf] capitalism wd save 99% of bureaucratic suffocation of economy - every world empire so far has been suffocated to death by bureaucracy - once you allow unlimited fortunes, you have to be endlessly making & policing laws trying [& failing] to control the myriad bad effects - eg, antitrust laws, anticorruption]

2006-10-16 15:00:51 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-16 14:47:27 · 2 answers · asked by HerKomisar 1

is this good thinking? - we dont want to disturb the profit setup, for many reasons, but we can justly prevent profits generating evergrowing accelerating wealthconcentration/ injustice/ violence by limiting individual fortunes to the maximum [or some multiple of the maximum] that an individual can earn by their own work - calculating this thus: 50 hrs x 50 weeks x 50 years x world-avg hrly pay, minus minimum lifetime spending [say, US$15,000/yr] = US$1 million [2006 $s] & distributing the overfortunes regularly equally among everyone [every family wd get another US$70,000/yr] - we can set the fortune limit at this, or 2x or 10x this, & thus justly totally prevent the endless hoovering of earnings by the various legal thefts in the economy [richgetricheretc], causing escalation of violence misery to total extinction [we already have 60x the bombs for total extinction]
[if we pay tertiary students for studying [which is just] there are no reasons for higher than avg hrly payrate]

2006-10-16 13:32:19 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

[eg] bill gates [bg] does what everyone does: decides to do smthg & does it - some decide to build hotrods, climb mountains, breed horses, become a secretary, invent, study - bg spends no more hrs working than billions of others - he uses his natural gifts - like everyone - he works no harder/hr than billions - he does what everyone does: work using whatever nature's gifts they have - true?
besides, we KNOW that the spectacular profits are due to difference between costs & prices - we know that costs include all pay for all work, including bg's work [incl his study] - therefore we know that profits have nothing to do anyone's input - the profits are caused by scarcity, ratio of demand & supply [before the 'invisible hand' lowers the prices], ie, customers giving more [money, ie, their wrk] than they get [total wrkinput in product] - ie price [buyer's wrk] = costs [product total wrk] + profits = fairexchangenorobbery + robbery = richgetricheretc = injustice violence nuclear extinction

2006-10-16 12:38:35 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

Just a survey to see where people keep their money.

2006-10-16 07:47:00 · 6 answers · asked by joeblackfrog 1

2006-10-16 06:17:40 · 11 answers · asked by rach 1

2006-10-16 05:46:50 · 4 answers · asked by chitalu c 1

personally i would buy a million pounds worth of reeses pieces, that shits gold

2006-10-16 05:44:20 · 44 answers · asked by Anonymous

According to Phillips Curve, this has a inverse relationship between unemployment rate and rate of inflation, simply, the lower the unemployment in an economy, the higher the rate of inflation in that economy.
is there any possible to have an economy that low unemployment rate and low inflation rate happen at the same time?
Thanks.

2006-10-16 05:12:52 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

While the unofficial currency in central and south America is USD the number of countries adopting Euro as their official currency has been increasing. Meanwhile However there are ones like the UK, that resist this process.

2006-10-16 05:05:11 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

please give me a site where I can find great information on credit cards and debit cards consumers in the u.s.

2006-10-16 04:21:47 · 2 answers · asked by lala_jonesy 2

2006-10-16 03:45:41 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-16 03:29:37 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

A petition should be made up due to their practices, The money a bank has, minus interest, is ours!

Here is a question I posted, and the answers seem too agree w/ me.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20061016053147AAPjTXO&r=w

(Cut and paste if this isn't a link)

I know of petitions online, but who do the various banks report to...I would assum the FDIC.

2006-10-16 02:18:41 · 4 answers · asked by Benjamin W 3

A guy from TAMU told me so...it's terrible,I am just major in electric power. I have to thinking about switching my major

2006-10-16 01:52:34 · 2 answers · asked by Jason 2