Physics - December 2006

and what is the ratio or formula to figure it out my self,also boiling point increases as pressure builds thank you for any help.

2006-12-10 03:19:30 · 1 answers · asked by farmall-H 1

How much heat would be rejected by the engine if 1.00 x 10^6 calories were taken from the high temperature reservoir?

2006-12-10 03:18:44 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

as a power source...?

2006-12-10 02:50:50 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

Is most of the stuff in what the bleep do we know, just theory, or is in fact a proven thing that, superpositioning, we never touch anything, and entaglment that were all connected, law of attraction, and all that theory they tell us as its true,

And also how can they say an atom is empty space with a charge if there are subatomic particles inside of them that are real matter and not empty space/./....... i think they better rethink what they say...

i am having trouble believeing it all....

2006-12-10 02:03:06 · 4 answers · asked by Aaron T 2

2006-12-10 01:40:07 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-10 01:05:34 · 8 answers · asked by timbo44b 3

2006-12-10 00:52:59 · 7 answers · asked by mischievous_little_minx2002 1

A fluid of unknown density floats a .25m x .1m x .02m block of wood weighing .35kg. The block has .002m of its smallest side above the surface of the water. What is the density of the block? What is the density of the fluid? I found the density of the block to be 700 kg/m^3. Is this correct? And how do you find the density of the fluid?

2006-12-10 00:49:51 · 1 answers · asked by thestral 1

2006-12-10 00:28:42 · 6 answers · asked by HARISH KUMAR R 1

2006-12-09 23:34:31 · 8 answers · asked by wwwwwwwfe 1

2006-12-09 23:27:46 · 1 answers · asked by emiash 1

2006-12-09 23:10:07 · 5 answers · asked by manikant k 1

the reason that it is not advisable to measure a sample in a hot test tube.

2006-12-09 23:03:46 · 6 answers · asked by bunso 1

2006-12-09 22:25:25 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Example 1: Say you are standing with a chest-high boulder in front of you. Rather than jumping up from rest, it is easier to climb on top by first performing a small hop and jumping out of the "bounce." This is very intuitively understood when practiced.

Example 2: A punch can connect with greater force by actually jerking backwards briefly just before impact rather than following through. I am not a martial artist, but again this seems intuitive when attempted. You can feel the difference. I can also break more solidly in a game of pool by using this technique.

So the question: clearly this phenomenon exists, and I would like to know what the explanation is in terms the physics involved. It seems to me to be a recoil force of some sort, but I'm having trouble understanding why it doesn't work in the opposite direction. How does pulling back on a striking blow make it stronger? How does jumping out of a downward motion result in greater lift than jumping from rest?

Thx

2006-12-09 21:51:05 · 7 answers · asked by wwwwwwwfe 1

frequeny series lower than red light........
its relation with radioactive elements....

2006-12-09 21:25:22 · 3 answers · asked by kesz 1

I have ideas.......I just want to know what you think about it,
Do not use the words "Einstein" or "relative" when answering if you can.

Got any equations for this.....
Do not use the term "energy" or "E" when answering if you can

2006-12-09 20:57:39 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-09 20:49:23 · 5 answers · asked by arnoob1393 1

We're a mass of carbon and energy-Right?
So energry can't be destroyed or created but only change form-Right?
What do you think happens to it when we die?

2006-12-09 20:32:17 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-09 20:22:13 · 3 answers · asked by Great Man 1

HELP

2006-12-09 20:15:04 · 5 answers · asked by Queen of Boredom 2

Am I wrong in presuming that time is measured by the spin of the earth? Hours to mins to seconds and all according to one revolution? Because if that is the case, then time is going to vary from planet to planet isn't it? So is the atomic clock based on the spin of an electron of a certain ?? (Forgot the word... have drawn a blank.... The opposite of a compound) A quartz perhaps?
If time is based on this then its obviously fundamental measure and not something created by man according to the diameter of this rock we are all sitting on.

2006-12-09 20:03:26 · 4 answers · asked by ST K 1

2006-12-09 20:00:17 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

i was watching this show called 'on the beach' which speculates the consequences of a nuclear war between the US and China. In it, basically the entire human race is doomed because of the impending nuclear radiation covering the entire earth. What's the probability of that scenario happening if let's say nuclear bombs were dropped in two locations on the globe? will the radiation really spread to the rest of the world?

2006-12-09 18:56:21 · 7 answers · asked by philips 1

i was watching this show called 'on the beach' which speculates the consequences of a nuclear war between the US and China. In it, basically the entire human race is doomed because of the impending nuclear radiation covering the entire earth. What's the probability of that scenario happening if let's say nuclear bombs were dropped in two locations on the globe? will the radiation really spread to the rest of the world?

2006-12-09 18:55:26 · 3 answers · asked by philips 1

If i put in 1 individual cookie in the microwave it takes like 15 seconds to get heated and melted, but if i put two, then it isnt as warm and melted at 15 seconds. Why does it matter if there is an extra cookie on the plate? its not adding to the first cookie or anything.

Just wondering.

2006-12-09 18:54:12 · 3 answers · asked by fsadfsa s 1

what's your I.Q.?

2006-12-09 18:31:56 · 10 answers · asked by Jessie 2

Okay, so mirrors are perfectly smooth, so by creating a perfectly smooth surface, are we actually making a small gateway to another universe where everything is the same except a few small details that are unoticable? Like maybe the shirt I'm wearing in this universe looks the same through a mirror, but in reality is made of a completely different material. You can't go through because your 'reflection' always does the same and opposes you with an equal amount of force, right? Then how come you can see 'reflections' in shadows, and if you shine a light at a mirror, the angle of incidence might not equal the angle of reflection, but instead, both lights keep going through the portal, because light does not have mass or volume. I just thought of this, and I know I'm probably crazy, but does anyone out there think it's possible that mirrors are actually gateways? Also, if you hold one mirror while looking at another, you could be seeing more than one at once, just an answer to that.

2006-12-09 18:16:06 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

If the sun were to explode right now and for some reason lose all of it's mass and gravitational pull, when would we at earth be set loose like an anceint slingshot (like a david and goliath slingshot)? Would the effect take time to be felt, like how it takes time for the light to reach us or would it be instant?

2006-12-09 18:13:21 · 5 answers · asked by aleutone 1

2006-12-09 18:05:49 · 11 answers · asked by Tapout 4